ltucker305
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Posts
- 51
- Likes
- 10
I tried both and preferred the 1350. After learning the sweet spot I went back to find the sweet spot on the T50p and still preferred the DT1350.
I only auditioned these at Best Buy. They aren't horrible, just "blah". There is nothing special about them. It's not even that they are super accurate. Their detail retrieval is average and their highs are slightly rolled off. Bass is anemic. They are just plain boring. There are so many better headphones at their price point including:
PSB M4U1
B&W P5
V-Moda M-100
Sony MDR-1R
Sennheiser Momentum
Several new Monster headphones
Heck, I think I even prefer Beats Executive to these.
There are some very mixed reviews here but most are not glowing endorsements. Many comments say they don't belong in the $300 price range compared to some other headphones in that range but if they were less than half that cost, would they be worth it? Newegg is selling them today (for another 2hrs) for $130. Seems they should be worthwhile at that cost considering they were compared to the popular B&W P3s and P5s (with less bass). While reading these reviews, I was still on the fence at $130 but ordered them anyway.
It's an interesting question. I listen to mostly noise (rock, pop, punk) yet I want neutral sounding equipment. I don't want the audio components coloring the sound intended by the artist/producers. Though in a noisy environment, it helps to have increased bass. I have some music that's more subtle but not much where it's just acoustic instruments recorded, unaltered, direct to tape or digital. So knowing my equipment isn't altering the intended sound is important. I'm sure I'd be fooled initially into thinking that something that produces pumped up bass or increased high-mids is better or more revealing, but after listening to other familiar material, I'd realize that it's really a distortion of the original source. I avoid compressed files like mp3s (not dynamically compressed because that's nearly impossible to find these days though in loud environments it's probably needed). I'm sure I'd have a hard time distinguishing higher quality mp3s at 192 or above from uncompressed wav or flac files especially with the noise I listen to but I just don't want to feel like I might be missing something. I didn't order these ML Mikros 90's as my primary headphones. I wanted to have something other then ear buds to use occasionally for portability.
I'm sure the newegg deal is done for now but if anyone feels like they missed it, they sometimes repeat their 'shell shocker' deals. Or maybe this is just the first of many online sites that will be reducing the price on these. From most of the reviews here, it's clear they were not worth $300. I'll let everyone know in a week if I think they were worth $130 (plus CA tax for me).
my big question is what is the configuration of the driver in the MLs. is it regular dynamic, air motion transformer (AMT), planar dymamic, or what? if they are AMTs, it would be relevant to deeply investigate their sound. headphones as fashion statements seems foolish to me but truly improved sound at affordable pricing would be revelatory.
Newegg are now selling these for $110. See this post:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/651409/the-deals-thread-ii-read-the-first-post/2985#post_9708267
Credit to RochRx7 for the original post on the deals thread