zenemano
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2010
- Posts
- 25
- Likes
- 12
thanks, that would be very nice, but okay, I'll try to ask Lloyd first.
And hopefully you noticed that IBJ recently built a MAD and posted his work in this thread with plenty of pictures showing what you'd be getting yourself into. He did a great job and it didn't take him too long. I think part of the genious of the MAD is its simplicity.
yes, 40W, I've read it somewhere today.
on the other hand, Lloyd just sent the manual. I've uploaded it here, so it will be available for anyone:
kit manual + wiring diagrams
looks very detailed indeed.
damn... I can't wait.
I'm wondering whether my current DAC(/Amp) would be an appropriate match for the EAR+ HD.. It's an Audinst MX-1 (head-fi review here), and most people here would agree that the DAC section is great, however, the unit doesn't support the true bypass of the volume knob (~amp section?). This is a subject I've completely missed until now, so I'm intrested in what are your experiences with DACs like mine. how much does the attributes of sound of a non-bypassed amp (like soundstage, separation, etc.) affects the same attributes of the final sound you get at the end of the chain?
(also, please correct me where it's needed)
I think you'll get more and better answers to this question if you post it in the "sources" forum.
I'm not familiar with your DAC. If the volume control is in the digital domain, it may work by throwing away bits, which might be audible (bad). If it works in the analog domain (e.g. after conversion to analog), then the question is how the volume control is implemented. If the parts are good quality and the implementation is good, then you should not have a problem with it. In either case, you are probably best off operating it "full on" so the volume control doesn't affect the sound as much, and all the control of sound volume is done by the amplifier.
Hope this helps!