- Joined
- Jul 5, 2015
- Posts
- 505
- Likes
- 65
My point was that...
A. If you're going to compare with high end DAPs, at least use something contemporary. Why use an old, outdated DAP for comparison?
B. It definitely seemed to me like you were comparing L3's UI favorably to older high end DAPs, making them sound unattractive. Perhaps I misinterpreted, but that's how I read it.
C. I've been using portable media players since minidisc, where I owned every major brand and was on headfi in its early days (most likely before you, my friend) under the username "matheis". I've also owned Rio and iRiver DAPs amongst other old-skool DAPs. Those were honestly more user-friendly and full-featured than a lot of today's boutique DAPs, so I have a hard time excusing limited functionality as being us used to A&K, Apple iPod and such.
I'm in touch with more than a couple DAP manufacturers regarding UI improvements and have helped with FW revisions on a couple DAPs now and strongly feel as portable audio enthusiasts, we should be a bit less forgiving IMHO. Just my two cents, and anyone who wants is free to disagree.
I'm keeping my L3 for now and hope L&P make solid FW improvements soon.
I think what he was trying to say about older DAPs was that they lack UI as compared to modern DAPs these days but have superb SQ. So as long as you can close one eye on the minimalistic UI of L3 you will pretty much get a very good SQ that gives you a run for the money you spent on it. But these depends on personal needs though since there are people like us that won't really bother with the UI as long as it has a good SQ.