RADI0HEAD
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Posts
- 515
- Likes
- 517
You're suggestions have definitely been helpful Tomscy2000. I really enjoy learning in more detail about this area: sound and sound technology is a brilliant area.
I would very much hope that one or more of you could explain to me my above questions in good detail. I know relatively little about this subject and would really benefit from solid lessons that assume I know little of the subject!
In the end, if the ER-4P>S converter doesn't bring what I am hoping for, then I would agree that a set of IEMs that approach sound in a different way would be best.
Concerning one of the above questions that I raised about all sounds in a single driver being amalgamated into one single signal; I guess really what I'm saying is that if this is the case, perhaps multiple drivers is what I'm looking for. I recall many electronic instruments only being able to cope with a certain number of sounds before another signal is unable to be produced for example. Is this a similar case in IEMs with a single driver? Are these missing, individual sounds what I endeavour for? Is this what the perceived lack of response is in the sound?
Forgive me for my many questions, but I really love to learn! Thank you to all of you for what insights you have already given too.
This thread is from three years ago but still interesting to read through. http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/364089/single-driver-vs-multiple-drivers-my-thoughts-on-the-trend