Perhaps you could give us a brief comparison between the GO1K and GO SE.
OK, spent some time listening today while doing some office work. I did it sort of formally, it is a bit of a pain to disconnect 1 geek out, reconnect the other, go back and forth that way, so I Plugged both into a powered USB hub (Vaunix Lab Brick). JRiver is also a bit finicky with the Geek Out, I've had it crash a number of times just changing headphones, had to reboot the computer (not this time, though it did freeze a number of times, requiring a Task Manager closing and reopening), To minimize connecting/disconnecting, I had the Geek Out 1000 connceted to my JRiver 19. It is also a pain to keep changing the output in JRiver, so I had the Geek Out Special Edition running out of the Pono app (which is a rebranded and slightly redecorated JRiver200. I seems to be a bit better organized, ato least in the short time I have used it). Thus, I just had to move the headphones from 1 Geek to another. I liistened to Hi Rez files downloaded mostly from HDTracks, Grateful Dead American Beauty ("Ripple", "Brokedown Palace", "Truckin. Also listened to Beck's "
Cycle" from the latest album, Daft Punk's "Get Lucky", Ella Fitzgerald/Louis Armstrong "Cheek to Cheek", Bucky Pizzarelli's fabulously recorded 3 For All, Track "Undecided", And Elton John's "Funeral for a Friend/Love Lies Bleeding", from Goodbye Yellow Brick Road). Headphones were mostly Shure 2540, with some time given to the FAD Hope VI, to see if what I noted was related to interactions of the gear, and which did better. OK. let me review my notes.
Now, the Geek Out 1K is not a bad player, in fact, it is quite involving and drives most heaphones without much trouble. Compared to the Special Edition, though, it sounded dry, grainy, flattened, On the SE there was more air between instruments, more body/texture to the instruments, a more realistic presentation. Detail was captured by both, but was much cleared from the CE. The graininess and slightly exaggerated highs on the 1K made it less open than the SE, which presented a much more realistic picture of the voices, music, and the space they were in. Bass, present in both, has more texture from the SE. Funeral for a Friend/Love Lies Bleeding, was sharp, jumping out of the headphones on the SE, not so much on the 1K, more 1 dimensional, flatter, less involving. This held true for both headphones, though was in sharper contrast with the 1540-the FAD is a tad more forgiving. The GO 1K has some grain, and is a tiny bit hot in the treble to my ears. The SE has rounder, more fleshed out images, none of that tizziness, a relaxed presentation of the performance (which doesn't mean it doesn't swing it's cajonas off). Of course, this has to be kept if the context that the SE costs 3x the GO 1K; the 1K is a very good budget performer, and I enjoyed it a bit (minus volume issues) before I got the SE. Now it hardly sees any play time.
This is interesting, in a general way. First, just responding to a request. But LH seems to have integrated the basic inners of the Geek Out into the Pulse. As the add ons to go to the GO SE involved better components, Femto clocks, etc, I'd guess a similar process is involved in the upgrades to the Pulse X and the Xfi (though this is all surmise, I don't hae any official information). So, I'd expect the performance of the Xfi compared to the Stock pulse to be considerably better, in the ways that the GO SE improves on the GO 1k.
It's 1:30 AM, not as detailed as many post, but I think it gets the idea across.
Gear in question, Green is Geek Out 1K, Gold is Special Edition
)/