RockStar2005
Headphoneus Supremus
I don't agree with the 95-99% as many CDs from the 80's had great mastering, particularly the warner german releases and MOFI MFSL. However that probably depends on the genres we like.
However the fact that >48kHz doesn't matter? It is far from the most important factor. Performance and recording are THE most important, but Bob Stuart and MQA have a point. The "la la la fingers in my ears it cannot matter" sound science bunch are like moon landing denyers to me. It's not the frequency that matters it's the timing.
Timing is a huge percentage of music, and the ear is more sensitive to it than level.
Yeah. From my experience, the Hi-Res version is better than the CD version that often, but I've only done a handful of comparisons. I know that the Hi-Res version isn't always better than the CD version, I just know it USUALLY is. lol Not much in this "arena" is ever 100%, is it? Too much subjectivity. lol
There def were some Hi-Res albums I DIDN'T get because I'd read some poor reviews for them, and instead bought other versions that I could find in their place. Like I wanted to buy the 1st Rage Against The Machine album in Hi-Res, which just came out this year. But I checked and found some rather poor reviews on it. So instead I found that Amazon had a well-reviewed 20th Anniversary Remaster CD on sale for only like $8. I bought it, and it most definitely IS an improvement over the original! Most of the tracks had a bit too much bass added though, but that was quickly resolved by applying my own custom EQ ("Rock" EQ preset on Poweramp with the bass EQ bands turned slightly down). But the extra clarity and the album sounding more engaging than ever was well worth it! I simply ripped the CD and that was that.
Could you elaborate more on "timing"? Not sure what you mean. Are you implying that 48kHz+ music somehow is "timed" differently than sub-48kHz music, and therefore sounds better? Not following. Thanks.