Tjj226 Angel
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2012
- Posts
- 1,015
- Likes
- 590
You know, I don't recall if I came across someone comparing the two chips at a granular level, I haven't read into it deeply, but most say the PCM63 is "better", but the PCM56 is not far behind, both well-regarded tonally from my reading. The PCM63 is a 20-bit chip compared to the PCM56 which is a 16-bit. BUT once you get down to bit 15, 16...and beyond, the DAC needs to be well-engineered otherwise noise will dominate at that bit depth, you won't hear the extra bits anyway! So I wouldn't think the difference is due to dynamic range. Another example - the PCM56 is generally more highly regarded than its 18-bit counterpart, the PCM61. Notable also - the PCM63 does have better distortion specs than the PCM56. If I get serious about messing around with PCM63, will look into the subjective differences further.
Another thing though - the PCM63 is becoming quite rare, especially the best binned "K" grade, even the "J" run almost $100 a piece, you need two, whereas the PCM56 is very available and cheap. Better for experimenting
Batteries my son. You have to use batteries. Theoretically with batteries and low noise Jfets, you could reach down to 24bits of dynamic range.
One of my projects before the year is done is to build an all in one headphone system that uses batteries and low noise jfets to achieve a true 24 bit system.
Is it stupid? Yes. Why am I doing it? Because I can.