Kwak-Clock Mod

Mar 31, 2007 at 10:50 PM Post #62 of 99
Here is the schematic for the Kwak Clock in Eagle format.

http://www.savefile.com/files/596646

Feel free to improve it, or make your own PCB (make sure you post it too
biggrin.gif
)

As it turns out, the PCB I designed had a huge, huge flaw in it, so I am scrapping it and starting from scratch (it was a crappy 15 minute job anyway).

Note about the schematic, the two 2.2mH inductors are removed.
 
May 13, 2007 at 3:59 AM Post #64 of 99
Now if we only had KC8 schematic...
 
May 13, 2007 at 4:35 AM Post #66 of 99
My understanding was only that schematics weren't available, and that Elso was selling built versions. Why did you think it was a myth?

BTW, I've attached another clock that I've heard is quite good.
 
May 13, 2007 at 5:37 AM Post #67 of 99
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowbar /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My understanding was only that schematics weren't available, and that Elso was selling built versions. Why did you think it was a myth?

BTW, I've attached another clock that I've heard is quite good.



I wish I could read that schematic, cant read the names of the IC's...care to translate the schematic to Eagle?
 
May 13, 2007 at 5:48 AM Post #68 of 99
I don't know Russian, but only one of the ICs is in Cyrillic: 100LP116, which is supposedly a better performing version of the MC10116. The other ICs turn up in Google search; they're available in North America. The comments about OSCON SM series caps, and X7R for the ceramics, are obvious. Then something about resistors, 1206 which is surface mount, 5%. Something about 0.3 cm^2 and 0.5 cm^2 PCB heatsinking planes for the DA1 and DA2 regulators, correspondingly. Last comment is crystal brand recommendations in HC49 (personally I use custom low jitter crystals that ICM made for me). The second to last comment I don't have a clue about, however: something 100 pF about the DA3 comparator.

Keep in mind, as in any clock, PCB layout is critical.
 
May 13, 2007 at 6:38 AM Post #70 of 99
I think it's done by using the 'change' tool (spanner icon).

I suggest you try dual ground planes (top and bottom); it provides good shielding. Don't use long traces as they act like transmission lines and won't behave properly unless they have correct terminations (you'd get reflections otherwise).

For a simple circuit like this clock, I'd just create a 3D structure without PCB, as I can minimize all connection lengths.
 
May 13, 2007 at 6:39 AM Post #71 of 99
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowbar /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I don't know Russian, but only one of the ICs is in Cyrillic: 100LP116, which is supposedly a better performing version of the MC10116. The other ICs turn up in Google search; they're available in North America. The comments about OSCON SM series caps, and X7R for the ceramics, are obvious. Then something about resistors, 1206 which is surface mount, 5%. Something about 0.3 cm^2 and 0.5 cm^2 PCB heatsinking planes for the DA1 and DA2 regulators, correspondingly. Last comment is crystal brand recommendations in HC49 (personally I use custom low jitter crystals that ICM made for me). The second to last comment I don't have a clue about, however: something 100 pF about the DA3 comparator.

Keep in mind, as in any clock, PCB layout is critical.



What are the pins on the right? Other than the +9v.
 
May 13, 2007 at 6:42 AM Post #72 of 99
X1 is +9V, X4 is ground, and X2 and X3 are the inverted and non-inverted outputs. You can use both if you like balanced clock signal
smily_headphones1.gif


Note the 10LC116 is a single chip with three sections, and so only one of the ICs is used in the clock; the numbers by the connections are pin assignments.
 
May 14, 2007 at 12:46 PM Post #75 of 99
Whilst the effort is admirable, have you checked with Elso before publishing this? Firstly, it is only polite, and secondly he's had objections to this in the past - DIY means DIY to him, which is fair enough. If you don't want to go to the effort and expense of designing AND TESTING your own layout and keeping it your own, I don't see why he shouldn't take something back for his "official" board.

Just something to think about...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top