Hello everyone,
I've finally received my a130, so now I've finally had the opportunity to open it up and compare it to my a250. Now that I've done it, I can see that any of us with a250 might have realized what was up after seeing the a130 driver fix thread. Take a look (I'm just showing the backs because I don't want to tear off the earpad cushion from the front):
(sorry for the slight lack of clarity on these late-night photos)
The first thing you notice is the difference in the size of the housings. In principle, though, this shouldn't matter so much because the aperture for the driver is the same. Yet in the spot where the a250 driver is glued down, the a130 has an adapter plate instead to make a smaller driver fit. It's this adapter plate and the fact that the smaller driver just clicks into it and isn't glued that causes the famous rattle problem. You can see in the pic I've already done the ghingus scrap-of-paper mod, which seems most appropriately contemptuous for the laziness of the botched-in adapter plate.
You can see the smaller driver is not even 35mm across, and doesn't even look very similar to the a250 driver. One wonders whether the housing wasn't big enough to handle the larger one, or if the head office made the designers detune the a130 to justify its lower price point.
In any case, as to sound quality, I can tell you that despite its small driver the a130 isn't bad at all, but it is, as many here have suspected, no a250. I find that the a250 competes at the level of the HD600/650, K701, DT880/990, and SR-225/325i-- perhaps it doesn't win this category, but it does deserve to stand in it. The a130 on the other hand, is more a competitor at the $100 msrp bracket. Among my many headphones, I'd place it just above my AKG K240 and below my Beyer DT531, which is of course a respectable rank indeed. Certainly the a130 sounds far better than my KSC-75. But sadly an a250 it is not.