sghound
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2007
- Posts
- 376
- Likes
- 82
No matter how much I understand why the Senn HD800 or Stax are technically stunning products, I don't want to own them because the music I enjoy sounds thin and weak with them.
THIS
No matter how much I understand why the Senn HD800 or Stax are technically stunning products, I don't want to own them because the music I enjoy sounds thin and weak with them.
A couple other curious things I've come across that I feel might be related:I remember the "2 driver" thing, didn't recall the lack of crossover.
That's definitely curious. I'm surprised there are no cancellation issues, but I guess that means they were careful with the placement instead. Might lead to extra cohesion when there's no crossing, but that IS curious indeed. I would never have expected a multi-driver hybrid to have everything firing from top to bottom.
Okay so... if anyone's getting the ZS6, the stock cable is garbage. I don't know how or why, but when i swapped it out for the KZ silver-plated that they sell, the 6 sounded a LOT better.
Ok, glad I have a silver ready to go then. Also in the same boat on waiting for a delivery that should have happened by now, as my Monoprice M300 got into town yesterday, and I'm fairly sure UPS will sit on it until Wednesday for the delivery because that's what I paid for.
Do yourself a favor and listen to them with the stock cable first. Just so you can hear it. I honestly can't say I've been that crestfallen with a purchase before where I was just like "wow... I completely wasted my money."
Now that I've been listening for the past while with the other cable, I think they're a good upgrade. Bass is still plenty strong and has a nice tone to it.
I've pointed this out a few times - if you're not a believer in cables, you'd likely say something about cables being largely transparent as long as they're electrically sound (and I would tend to sort of agree for the most part)... thing is, KZ's stock cable for the ZS5/ZS6 are not electrically sound for the application they're being used in (>20% voltage drop). A few dB louder at the very least on an electrically sound cable would be expected (<5% voltage drop, as all of KZs upgrade cables are).Okay so... if anyone's getting the ZS6, the stock cable is garbage. I don't know how or why, but when i swapped it out for the KZ silver-plated that they sell, the 6 sounded a LOT better.
I've pointed this out a few times - if you're not a believer in cables, you'd likely say something about cables being largely transparent as long as they're electrically sound (and I would tend to sort of agree for the most part)... thing is, KZ's stock cable for the ZS5/ZS6 are not electrically sound for the application they're being used in (>20% voltage drop). A few dB louder at the very least on an electrically sound cable would be expected (<5% voltage drop, as all of KZs upgrade cables are).
Not saying it's gonna start a fire, way too little power for that... but not surprising that there's audible differences imo.
Yeah, about that, just typing "ZS6" in YouTube will pop up 2~3 not very informative "unboxing reviews" basically saying that the ZS5 and ZS6 sound the same. And they'll say something like "The ZS6 is slightly better", or "Don't bother with the ZS6 if you have the ZS5".
The other surprising thing that I found out just by typing "KZ" into YouTube is that the ZS5 is not universally accepted as the best-sounding KZ earphone. Some guy said that he'd rather use the ATR/ATE and that the ZS3 was his favorite. His main complaint with the ZS5 was the harsh treble. He never talked about the ZSE however. I say this because another guy was hyping up the ZSE saying it's better than the ZS5.
I understand that these reviews are very subjective. But when people complain about harsh treble it's a red flag to me. I am glad I listened to a bunch of "not very informative amateur reviews" and saved my money. Because the ZS5/ZS6 are super expensive compared to the dirt cheap ZSE or ATR which some say "sound better". They are entitled to an opinion.
And I am still rambling here, but it just makes me wanna listen to every KZ IEM out there but I'd be $200 lighter and have a drawer full of earbuds...
I don’t look at YouTube for anything headphone related (and almost always Amazon too). Just too many nobodies that simply post a video to get YouTube views, free products, or free points from all of the various Chinese ecommerce sites. 97% of them have absolutely no clue what they’re talking about or the reviews are unreliable.
Not to mention that there’s numerous documented cases of companies flat out PAYING YouTubers money $500 in at least 1 case) to blatantly give a favorable review (without disclosing this of course).
If you’re just looking for a unboxing video so you can see what the cable looks like and what accessories are included, great. If you want an honest and accurate review including sonic reviews that actually make sense (vs simply “it sounds really clear with good bass”) then I avoid it like the plague.
Well, the way I see it:
Very obvious flaws will be pointed out by anyone, no matter how knowledgeable they are.
I am looking for things like:
- Harshness in the treble
- Poor fit
- Build Quality issues
- Any other flaw that hinders the user experience
So I will not be buying the ZS6 because of the "harshness in the treble".
So I went digging in this thread because I thought I recalled people saying KZ was the OEM making a lot of those drivers...
What I found was something quite the opposite...
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/knowledge-zenith-kz-impressions-thread.698148/page-564#post-12190697
To me at least, that sounds like KZ is the client and they hire an OEM to produce their foreign trade products...
I wonder if that's part of the mysterious relationship between KZ and QKZ...
Not when someone is getting paid to flat out lie so the company can sell headphones.
The reviewers give glowing reviews.
So how do you prevent that?