rixtrix
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2006
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 0
Photo proof that I was listening to the Pico with my 701's.
http://fueger.smugmug.com/photos/214123967-S.jpg
http://fueger.smugmug.com/photos/214123967-S.jpg
Originally Posted by immtbiker /img/forum/go_quote.gif Rocky Point, Cathedral Pines or the Greenbelt. At Rocky Point, there's still a tree with part of my wife's (BrownieLady) helmet stuck to it, when she did a "superman" and tree met Bell Snell 85 approved! |
Originally Posted by SoFlaChris /img/forum/go_quote.gif You are very observant, young Grasshopper. First, the background noise. Unremarkable on both units. While I did not remove the sources, I did pause the music on both. There was no hiss or any noticeable artifact. Regretfully, I wish that I pulled the sources and turned up the amps into the IEMs, so that I can definitively state whether or not there was any hiss. Next, the gain switches. While, I did try them on both, I spent more time with the Predator, so I'll comment on that one. There are 3 settings; 1, 4, and 11 (dB gain or attenuation, I assume). To the best of my recollection, the 4 sounded better, as I was allowed more flexibility in volume control and it was a tad warmer. The 1 was too "in my face" and 11 was a bit muted (provided that I was in the right mode... someone feel free to chime in). Anyway to answer your question, there was a very noticeable difference in the gain settings. If I were to choose which amp/DAC I'd use with my IEMs, the choice would be the Predator, vis-a-vis the Pico. It was warmer and fuller. If it was an amp only, I really liked the LaRocco Diablo. Later Al... |
Originally Posted by Voltron /img/forum/go_quote.gif Perfect! Thanks Chris. |
Originally Posted by dmk005 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I But seriously, I struggle with understanding how these comparisons do not shed a more favorable light on the Pico since a "refined" sound is generally more high fidelity, detailed and tonally favorable. We have also heard the comparison of the predator amp to the Hornet "M". What would you say is the analogue comparison to the Pico? The Lisa III perhaps? david |
Originally Posted by tyrion /img/forum/go_quote.gif ... I want to welcome the new guys (no names until your second meet as we don't want to get too attached only to find out we scared you off ). |
Originally Posted by jp11801 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Not sure what you were looking for but I think 4 or 5 people preferred the Pico with one preferring the predator. The comments were meant to fair and balanced I think we all stated that both were good amps that we all could live with and enjoy but prefered the one over the other. |
Originally Posted by jp11801 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I would say that the amp section reminds me of the AE2 which I like but I think it might sound better than the AE2. I am not sure that I would say it share the Lisa signature I have only heard that amp with PS1s. |
Originally Posted by immtbiker /img/forum/go_quote.gif At Rocky Point, there's still a tree with part of my wife's (BrownieLady) helmet stuck to it, when she did a "superman" and tree met Bell Snell 85 approved! |
Originally Posted by gpalmer /img/forum/go_quote.gif That explains why she married you! Thanks, I've been wondering about that Aaron... |
Originally Posted by immtbiker /img/forum/go_quote.gif Now, why didn't you tell me that at the meet? Everyone kept calling your name but they were false alarms! |