Quote:
Originally Posted by The Monkey /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I think this entire debate is kind of odd. I would expect that both camps would want the most information possible in order to make an informed decision as a consumer. So why would testing be a bad thing? Hell, I think my Cardas Senn cable makes a difference, but I have no idea if that's because of placebo effect or if it actually makes a difference. Regardless, I think I hear a difference. But I still wouldn't mind being disproven; I would just find it fascinating to see if a well-controlled study could be done to provide some evidence one way or the other.
|
Indeed, and this is where caveat emptor takes precedence. If one believes that the objective measurements of a cable fully explain and establish its value, then so be it. If one, on the other hand, believes that the subjective experiences of a cable fully explain and establish its value, then likewise, so be it. Neither belief can be proven satisfactorily to either side of the debate - but if one keeps an open mind and understands that reality resides in both, and not *just* one or the other, better decisions can be made as far as esoteric, niche market audio gear goes.
Seeking more information is never a bad idea, but claiming that objective data outright trumps subjective data (and vice a versa) is ignorant.
Claiming DBT's or pure unsubstantiated opinions will provide a definitive answer (to anything!) is even more shortsighted.
further, since *most* of us don't have a slew of test gear to substantiate any manufacturers claims per the specific measurements of any device, but do have ears, if you buy what sounds better while being aware of the potentially biased measurements, marketing and advertising hype, etc., you might make decisions which keep you from falling victim to audiophilia nervosa.
Hence:
your.
milage.
may.
vary.
The person who claims to have ALL the answers is the most suspect, IMHO. Knowing and believing that you don't know is a very powerful testament to character.