pekingduck
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 16, 2009
- Posts
- 2,281
- Likes
- 165
Why does the chasis look so much like the Nagra SD 2 channel portable recorder??
Probably because Lotoo is an OEM of Nagra equipment.
Why does the chasis look so much like the Nagra SD 2 channel portable recorder??
where can I download the new firmware ?
Thanks
where can I download the new firmware ?
ThankSince you represent Infomedia (Lotoo ) can you please tell us when the next firmware will be available for download on website, and what changes does it bring.Best headphones/IEM that were tested with the Paw Gold and had best synergy? Many thanks in advance.
In future, I can send you new firmware for test by email. We are working on it.
In future, I can send you new firmware for test by email. We are working on it.
I met Xiao Qi from Infomedia, one of the two brands of the company with Lotoo. They are the leader in recording equipment in China and the main OEM for Nagra.
We met at the store of their dealer in Beijing. I have to say this store is incredible. It has almost all existing DAPs and tons of high end gear to test.
Xiao Qi was very nice and helpful and gave me a presentation of their company and Paw Gold. The intent of this product is to have top build quality, SQ and ergonomics and it is absolutely the case. They say it is made for quality and not to be a fashion statement. The jog dial is a sun in reference to the God Apollo.
First of all, the Paw is much smaller than it appears in the pics, and very convenient in one hand, even though it is very heavy.
The build quality is a absolutely great, this player screams of high end professional product. This product seems indestructible, it is impossible to scratch the screen and the buttons and dials are top quality.
The startup and operations are lightning fast and intuitive. Even though the UI is spartan, it works like a charm.
Now to the sound. First thing, the Paw has two gain settings and is very powerful, I do not doubt it could power cans quite well even though I only tested with IEMs : my SE5 and Roxannes, as well as the Sony Z5. I was constantly comparing with my RWAK240 and that was a good idea because I find them quite similar. Their levels of performance are quite close and their signature are fairly similar : neutral and detailed. The key differences are that the Paw is more powerful, has slightly less width and airiness but more bass body and more depth of sound. I would say that the Paw is between the RWAK240 and the 901 with discrete card in terms of sound.
Overall you can tell I really liked it, though I am not sure I will get it as it is really close to my RWAK240.
I am very happy with PAW Gold as it is what I wanted from a DAP sound wise, finding the right pairing is still working progress but I managed to find some which has kept me really engaged. But on the other hand I honestly did not notice any burnin changes.
At this stage I am working on building a rig around PAW Gold. CKR10, CK100pro,F111, K3003. e-Q8 and Th900 are not go-to gears however F111 proved to be the best pairing for me.