Impedence Question?
Sep 24, 2006 at 3:47 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 18

trose49

Banned
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Posts
3,528
Likes
10
If the UE-10's have an impedance of 13.3 and the super.fi 5 pros have an impedance of 21. Would'nt it be hard to drive UE-10's with an IPOD or do I have that backwards?

Any UE10 owners with IPODS please submit review. Do you get enough volume without an amp?

my superfi. 5pros sound best at about 70-75% Ipod volume.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 4:34 PM Post #2 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by trose49
If the UE-10's have an impedance of 13.3 and the super.fi 5 pros have an impedance of 21. Would'nt it be hard to drive UE-10's with an IPOD or do I have that backwards?

Any UE10 owners with IPODS please submit review. Do you get enough volume without an amp?

my superfi. 5pros sound best at about 70-75% Ipod volume.



You shouldn't be listening to IEMs that loud. I've never had the super.fi's but I know that a portable is capable of driving headphones of that low of impedance and high efficency to deafening volumes. The UE-10's will be fine out of an Ipod due to low impedance and high efficency.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 4:56 PM Post #3 of 18
That does not answer my question at all?
confused.gif
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 5:10 PM Post #4 of 18
They are both fine for ipod.

Headphone impedance is somewhat equal to its resistant, the higher the more power needed to achieve the same SPL. This means if you fix on the same volume, UE-10 will sound louder than super.fi 5 pros, but than 21ohms is quite a low impedance, it should have no problem. I will say you wont have much problem with anything below 35ohms on an ipod (i dont own one so cant be sure).

All thing been said, the reason Etymotic have ER6i (16ohms) is because ER6 is 48ohms and sound dimmer on ipod. But the fact is ER6 is much more natural (and detail) than ER6i. (VERY) Generally speaking, higher impendance make headphone sound better. If you look at all the new Senn, almost all are 64ohms, higher than many clip-on headphone, but they sound wonderful when amped.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 5:27 PM Post #5 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by muckluck
The UE-10's will be fine out of an Ipod due to low impedance and high efficency.


How didn't that answer your question?
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 6:00 PM Post #6 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by muckluck
You shouldn't be listening to IEMs that loud. I've never had the super.fi's but I know that a portable is capable of driving headphones of that low of impedance and high efficency to deafening volumes. The UE-10's will be fine out of an Ipod due to low impedance and high efficency.


I wanted to know if a lower impedence number means louder same volume. I didnt need the scholding on volume. I like my music loud and everyone ears are different. 70% to me may sound like 40% to you.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 6:39 PM Post #7 of 18
Also don't forget iPods now have a volume limiting feature under the settings menu so 70% on your iPod might be 100% on mine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by trose49
I wanted to know if a lower impedence number means louder same volume. I didnt need the scholding on volume. I like my music loud and everyone ears are different. 70% to me may sound like 40% to you.


 
Sep 24, 2006 at 6:42 PM Post #8 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by trose49
I wanted to know if a lower impedence number means louder same volume. I didnt need the scholding on volume. I like my music loud and everyone ears are different. 70% to me may sound like 40% to you.


I'm just letting you know that you are listening to music at dangerous levels. I'm looking out for your ears. You have to be listening around 85+ dB with volume like that, and unless you listen to music in 2 minute sessions that is incredibly bad for your ears. Sorry if I offended you, just trying to look out for my fellow head-fier.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 6:44 PM Post #9 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by trose49
I wanted to know if a lower impedence number means louder same volume.


No, strictly speaking it doesn't. With a lower impedance you can however extort more power from a low voltage portable and if efficiency is the same this will lead to more maximum volume.

Quote:

70% to me may sound like 40% to you.


I guess that's exactly what he was warning you about.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 6:56 PM Post #10 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeterR
I guess that's exactly what he was warning you about.


Yeap. That's exactly it.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 7:06 PM Post #11 of 18
Quote:

Originally Posted by muckluck
You shouldn't be listening to IEMs that loud. I've never had the super.fi's but I know that a portable is capable of driving headphones of that low of impedance and high efficency to deafening volumes. The UE-10's will be fine out of an Ipod due to low impedance and high efficency.


Low impedance doesn't mean anything. IEMs are more efficient than a lot of portable phones, but the iPod has a pretty weak headamp.

As far as the OP's question is concerned, low impedance usually means easier to drive. The bigger deal, though, is sensitivity. High sensitivity means easy to drive.
 
Sep 24, 2006 at 7:12 PM Post #12 of 18
Generally headphones with low impedances are good for portable players, since they don't need high voltages (something battery-driven equipment can't deliver). But there's a second aspect: Most portable players suffer from undersized buffer capacitors in the headphone output, thus low-impedance loads lead to early bass drop-offs -- the lower the impedance, the more massive.

attachment.php


The above graph isn't from a latest-generation iPod, but I doubt that the newer ones behave differently.
.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top