It's a bamboo monitor riser/shelf that I got from Amazon. It does make a nice little desktop rack for mid-size components, though.
Amazon.com : SONGMICS Bamboo Monitor Stand Riser, Laptop Stand, for Cellphone, TV, Printer, with 2-Tier Desktop Storage Organizer, Patented ULLD217 : Office Products
So I wanted to revisit this statement and add some more context after listening to both the Neo and Modius for awhile. It turns out that I don't love the ADI-2 as much I thought I did. I love the features, functionality, and engineering quality, but I've had the nagging feeling for a while that something has been missing that I couldn't quite put my finger on. It wasn't until directly comparing to the other two DACs that I figured it out. There's something off about the rendering of microdynamics on the ADI-2 that are supposed to convey small musical flourishes that gives music it's inherent artistic nature. Think of the subtle differences in intensity that a pianist can strike the keys, or the different velocities a drummer strikes a drum to create the feeling of a pocket groove. The ADI-2 kind of sucks the life out of those microdynamics.
Even the $200 Modius notably improves on this over the ADI-2, despite both using the same DAC chip, (different) IC Op Amp stages, and low distortion measurements. The Neo excels at this even more. Going back to the ADI-2, I realized the bass extension between it and the Neo is similar, but I don't feel the need for bass boost on the Neo. What I think I was trying to do with the EQ of the ADI-2 wasn't to correct frequency response; the brain does a pretty good job of that on its own. I was trying to add dynamic contrast to the ADI-2 that wasn't present to begin with. This is especially evident with older recordings, which sounded flat and dead on the RME, but lively and musical with both the Neo and Modius. The ADI-2 worked great with over-processed pop and hip-hop music recordings which, as many may know, tend to be very dynamically compressed in mastering. It's one of those things that doesn't jump out at you as sounding bad, but now that I know it's missing I don't think I can go back, despite the extra features.
This kind of leads into an interesting and unexpected observation about the Neo. I'm finding that the 4.4mm output of the Neo is the real star of the show; I keep finding myself wanting to go back and listen to it despite having a higher-end balanced amp. Does this mean I think the Neo's built in amp is better than my dedicated amp? No. The Soloist 3X and Neo actually share some similar sonic traits such that the effect is additive and maybe it can be "too much of a good thing": Like chocolate on chocolate ice cream. Both are spacious and a touch rich, so the combination can make the midrange feel a little more distant than ideal. The Neo's 4.4mm output strikes an ideal tonal balance, though; it's like chocolate and vanilla. Same with the Modius + Soloist 3X. The Modius is kind of a dry and midrange focused DAC (vanilla).
The built-in balanced-amp of the Neo also really shines with those microdynamic flourishes that I mentioned earlier. That's why I was getting such positive impressions with drums, for instance. I'll try to go into more details in my formal review, but I just thought I'd share thoughts as I go along. It also helps me organize my thoughts so I can come back to it when I'm writing the review.