Thorsten Loesch
Member of the Trade: Studio RaumklanG, Studio Cocktail
The Diablo is still a wonderful bit of gear within its design limitations.
Thank you. I always try to the best possible.
I am more than happy with mine even if it could potentially have been technically better.
Many of the changes would have been more in usability, things like volume control from the xDSD/xCAN, BT input etc. MQA on all inputs....
Essentially a "Gryphon" but dual DAC, fully differential version circuit with much lower noise using otherwise the same new headphone amp circuitry as Diablo.
Most of the very justified criticism of user experience I read in this thread would thus have simply been designed out.
I assume the same lack of cohesion between designer and salesmen resulted in the lack of clarity, or even perhaps even complete lack of awareness, over the line in feature.
I included this primarily so it is possible to measure the headphone amplifier isolated from the DAC, as specifically it's distortion is very low, much lower than the DAC.
Because the iDSD micro had a line in and there had been some comments critical of it's performance as headphone amp via line in (against very expensive stand alone desktop HP Amp's) marketing explicitly wanted "absolutely no line in".
Funny to see a line in on the "Gryphon" which I didn't work on. Anyway, I did not "take out" the line in as it works on an absolutely fundamental hardware level.
Anyway, I viewed the design more as a prototype and potential small scale preview for a new headphone Amplifier than a product that should sell to paying customers.
So the Line In "feature" stayed in and was just memory holed and not talked about when the product was released.
Thor