The LTA Velo impressed me at CanJam. How would you describe the differences between it and the HP8?
Sure, I'm still doing some comparisons back and forth and trying different tube combinations. For now I can share I the following when listening to each with a few of my HP's:Great question. As an owner of the HP8 (wonderful) who thinks often about the Velo, I'm curious about this comparison.
I would use the Velo primarily as a remote-controlled preamp, but still--how it sounds via hp output is likely to track, at least approximately, how it would sound via preamp output.
- The Velo has lovely spaciousness and separation of the music that is better than what I hear from the HP-8. It has a smooth presentation I am finding quite enjoyable and the detail is coming through very nicely paired with the Bifrost 2/64.
- Tube rolling is very easy with each amp and the Velo has the option to use 12SN7/12SX7 series tubes (voltage switch on back) in place of the 6SN7's
- The three RCA inputs for the Velo are easy to switch and each holds the volume setting in memory from the last input setting. The remote works well and does make it handy to use as a preamp to an integrated speaker amp. The Velo is helping my KEF desktop speakers sound wonderful.
- The HP-8 has a fuller presentation and delivers the output in a stronger commanding way with HP's that I prefer more than the Velo.
- The multi-tap impedance matching on the HP-8 makes it work so well with all my dynamic and planar HP's so it is still the champ for me.
I like the versatility of the Velo as a preamp and may try other chain combinations with it. Each has their strengths that I'm enjoying and I like experimenting to see what tube combinations work well with each.
Last edited: