Thanks for the recommendation! I'm not much of a metal head but have just begun listening to that album while typing this. Seems to be recorded fairly "hot" (such is the case with so many modern recordings) but the dynamics and powerful sense of space immediately jump out, with impressive soundstage depth.Try MQA albums that is encoded at minimum 24 bits . The new musics are all in that MQA or 16/44.1
So for modern Music, at least MQA is very useful because that is the whole industry is heading.
However, Quoobuz is also pushing the High-Res games. You just need to be careful, some of them are Upsampled, and some are studio made
If you asked me for modern music, you better stick to MQA with 24bits depth. At least you eliminate one of the Bit Depth reduction factor. The master quality and how it was recorded is another matter though
@Bosk if you like Apocalyptica, try their new Cell-0 in MQA, pretty good
It feels incredible listening to music for the first time at such high levels of sound quality. Older folk will remember the days of listening to FM radio to discover new music (a surprisingly high-end source if you were lucky to own something like a Magnum Dynalab tuner with a beefy antenna) before purchasing the CD to hear what it really sounds like.
Getting back to the technical stuff I'm no stranger to the sad reality more bits in a fancy new format does not necessarily equate to better sound, with numerous purchased HDTracks 24bit albums that sound worse than the 16/44 versions to show for it - I get jittery (not that kind of jitter) upon seeing the term "Remastered" these days. I won't attempt to open up the whole PCM vs DSD can of worms either. So any news the industry is getting its act together re: streamlining hi-res recording standards would be welcome indeed.