lee730
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Posts
- 16,804
- Likes
- 452
Quote:
I was making fun! $1000 , YEAH
Another way to emulsify mula from ones pocket .
I was making fun! $1000 , YEAH
I just read the entire review. I still think the pros (and to be honest, I'm not even sure I know what they were) don't come anywhere near making up for all the missing features.
It's essentially an audiophile iPod Shuffle at 10 times the price
and one more thing....you said you prefer the DX100 for it's SQ. The ES9018 (DX100 DAC chip) is known for it's soundstage, detail, etc....and the Burr Brown 1704 (HM801 DAC chip) more for it's musicality and an "easy to listen to" nature. Did you find the DX100 more "musical" and "easy to listen to" as well?
I am a computer science major in college right now and the way that the device was made, seems to have a lot of advantages, just very focused ones. The main issue is that it cannot support power hungry headphones. The fact that the decoding of the files is written in assembly language means complete efficiency in the process, as well as complete control in terms of the programmer. Nothing extra is going on when playing a file on the device.
It's interesting but also a bit disappointing since if you spend a $1000 on a device you can't use it for most applications.
I am a computer science major in college right now and the way that the device was made, seems to have a lot of advantages, just very focused ones. The main issue is that it cannot support power hungry headphones. The fact that the decoding of the files is written in assembly language means complete efficiency in the process, as well as complete control in terms of the programmer. Nothing extra is going on when playing a file on the device.
It's interesting but also a bit disappointing since if you spend a $1000 on a device you can't use it for most applications.
Thank you drmind. You've set my mind at ease with that comparison. There was another headfier to did a comparison and had some Chinese Humor to boot.
Lee, Do some good deeds for your karma , before you get your Ibasso , just in case, to be on the safe side
I have been doing some nice things. Redirecting the millions of headfiers to Kaysen lol. I've had so many requesting directions on how to go about it that I made a template to just copy and paste over lol.
As I said, from the first moment I started listening to HM801 I really liked it. Indeed, it is musical and a pleasure to listen to. But it is a certain type of musicality. It's warm and cosy and very dense at the same time. The DX100 is musical too but on the other hand. It has more "presence" effect. It's like actually being there and hearing all that's going on on stage. Listening to DX100 is really exciting and fun while listening to HM801 is just pleasant. I've listened to the Overture track from Tron Legacy OST. And while the HM801 could deliver a decent sound with the pleasant signature, the DX100 really got the emotional side of this track. It reproduced the orchestral part so well that I had got my breath stopped for a moment.
I think the HM801 is just in different league, in different approach on producing sound. HM801 sets the goal to sound nice while DX100 sets the goal to reproduce the record the way it meant to be by recording engineers. And I think this is the right direction to go, because the goal of sounding nice must be set for the recording engineers not for player manufacturers.
Once again - this is just my impressions with a brief experience with HM801.