sajunky
Headphoneus Supremus
Not a ladder type converter but Delta Sigma, so I am sure your claim is false.Why stop at Nobsound? Apple dongle produces violins just as accurately and it's only $9!
Not a ladder type converter but Delta Sigma, so I am sure your claim is false.Why stop at Nobsound? Apple dongle produces violins just as accurately and it's only $9!
Now, the question is at what point we reach a level beyond which improvements are marginal enough to be ignored.
Do different violins sound the same? I mean they're all violins, right?
Of course different DACs can sound different. Why wouldn't they if they're not identical in configuration and design (thought I understand not all differences will present audibly)? I've heard DACs I like that are a tenth of the price of mine and which make me regret spending the money. You don't in fact need to spend big money to get good DAC performance, but they CAN sound different. VERY different. I've listened to DACs in my system that are SO different it was like comparing Mozart with a herd of dying cats.
So, if I perceive a 10-15% performance improvement from Stellia to Susvara, how much improvement will I perceive if I upgrade from WM1Z as my DAC to something like TT2+MScaler or DAVE?I don't have any experience in desktop DACs since I've always been an IEM/portable set up type of person. I actually haven't been in the audiophile world since late 2013'ish and just returned in November this year when I bought the Stellias which I love and remain my favourite headphones. I was driving them from my iPhone 6 and iPod nano and they still blew my mind since I was upgrading them from some CIEM I bought in 2010.Then I found a massive improvement in sound when I upgraded my source to Sony WM1Z. At that point I was still reluctant to fully commit to a desktop setup.
I eventually decided to expand beyond the portable world and added an full sized tube amp (Manley Absolute) and now I am considering adding a full sized DAC to replace my WM1Z. However, I am really unsure to HOW MUCH improvement upgrading a DAC will yield considering I am in the believer that headphones > amps > dacs in importance.
To give an idea of how I hear improvements, since buying the Stellia, I've researched/tried open back counterparts including Utopia, LCD4, Empyrean, HD820, and Susvara. All of them except the Susvara had a major deal breaker somewhere in sound that I couldn't overlook. Susvara is the only 1 that did nothing wrong to my ears and I bought those to complement my Stellia. In comparison, the Susvaras are clearly a level above Stellia in every comparable category like sound stage, imaging, separation, detail retrieval, dynamics, etc... How much improvement I perceived in technical performance from Stellia to Susvara is what led me to asking the question in this thread.
The improvements were noticeable but it definitely wasn't night and day difference. For example, I heard small details in songs on Susvara that I never heard on Stellia, like maybe a bell in the background somewhere, echos, or small bass beats in the distance, nothing major, just little extras here and there. Images had a sharper outlines around them and so forth. It's hard to put a numerical value to these improvement but if I had to I'd say it's 10-15% improvement in technicalities.
So, if I perceive a 10-15% performance improvement from Stellia to Susvara, how much improvement will I perceive if I upgrade from WM1Z as my DAC to something like TT2+MScaler or DAVE?
I am aware of the diminishing returns in each dollar spent. However, is the performance gap between the DAC in the WM1Z and something like TT2 greater than that of the Stellia to Susvara, leading to more significant improvements overall?
Edit:
To expand a bit on what I am looking for, I enjoy WM1Z's rich, organic, laid back sound signature. I do NOT like forward, aggressive, analytical & bright sound signatures.
My "perfect" or "ideal" sound signature is warm, natural, slight bass/treble emphasis, wide & deep soundstage for EDM/Trance/Techno/Retro, hip hop/rap, r&b, and pop (I don't listen to any other genres). Extracting every last detail & technical precision isn't as important as overall enjoyability of the music
I'm not sure it's possible to answer your question. From my perspective, Susvara and Stellia are in completely different leagues, so obviously everyone hears things differently. You probably need to arrange to audition some DACs of interest. Worst case, buy something used and resell it if you don't like it. You don't really need to spend more than a few grand to get a DAC that'll be about 98% of the state-of-the-art sonically. Personally, I think the Chord products are overrated and overpriced, but a lot of people on this site seem to love them.So, if I perceive a 10-15% performance improvement from Stellia to Susvara, how much improvement will I perceive if I upgrade from WM1Z as my DAC to something like TT2+MScaler or DAVE?
=> Might be 2 to 3 times better in DAC section
Marketing works together with placebo effect. And I'd like to see how we can measure satisfaction on a percentage scale.Personally, I think the Chord products are overrated and overpriced, but a lot of people on this site seem to love them.
I'm not sure it's possible to answer your question. From my perspective, Susvara and Stellia are in completely different leagues, so obviously everyone hears things differently. You probably need to arrange to audition some DACs of interest. Worst case, buy something used and resell it if you don't like it. You don't really need to spend more than a few grand to get a DAC that'll be about 98% of the state-of-the-art sonically. Personally, I think the Chord products are overrated and overpriced, but a lot of people on this site seem to love them.
So, if I perceive a 10-15% performance improvement from Stellia to Susvara, how much improvement will I perceive if I upgrade from WM1Z as my DAC to something like TT2+MScaler or DAVE?
=> Might be 2 to 3 times better in DAC section
I'm not sure it's possible to answer your question. From my perspective, Susvara and Stellia are in completely different leagues, so obviously everyone hears things differently. You probably need to arrange to audition some DACs of interest. Worst case, buy something used and resell it if you don't like it. You don't really need to spend more than a few grand to get a DAC that'll be about 98% of the state-of-the-art sonically. Personally, I think the Chord products are overrated and overpriced, but a lot of people on this site seem to love them.
Marketing works together with placebo effect. And I'd like to see how we can measure satisfaction on a percentage scale.
Depends on the product. Mojo/Qutest/Hugo 2 are absolutely fantastic.
I am really hoping so but we'll see...
True, I realize we all hear things differently and it's very hard to put a numeric value to sound. There's a lockdown of non essential businesses where I live until next at least next month. I might buy some used and resell to try stuff out in meantime. The reason I have Chord stuff on top of my list is the form factor. I didn't realize before I really researched desktop DACs but almost all of them are freaking HUGE. I keep all my audio stuff on a small 2'x2' coffee table next to my couch where I listen to music atm so I might need to look into moving my setup.
Haha I am not sure how much placebo effect I will get since I don't even know what to expect. I've been reading reviews on a lot of different Dacs past few days and most reviews are very vague when it comes to the actual sound quality, most of it is talking about features I will never use...
I will definitely keep those in mind!
This is right, as they have nothing to say. While all post point to a cheap Delta Sigma stuff with a BOM well below $80 (while some cost >$1k), perhaps you should try this: http://www.audio-gd.com/Pro/Headphoneamp/N11.28PE/NFB1128PEN.htmHaha I am not sure how much placebo effect I will get since I don't even know what to expect. I've been reading reviews on a lot of different Dacs past few days and most reviews are very vague when it comes to the actual sound quality, most of it is talking about features I will never use...
Discussion has shifted to Mojo, Hugo and a linear percentage scale, it is why my post. I can't compare with W1MZ, but I own R2R-11 and I can say it has all properties of high-end sound, except of a silky smooth presentation. Such sound only comes after careful removing of ground loops and any internal or external electromagnetic polution, it comes at a cost. If afforded I would imediately upgrade to their high-end stuff like R-7HE.I'm not sure I would put a NFB-11.28 and R2R 11 with high end DACs. It would be interesting and cheaper to purchase those and compare to the W1MZ to see if you can hear any difference though. If they're better, then you just saved yourself thousands of dollars.
I don't care much about measurements THD etc, but if it has as high coloration as Audio-gd R2R11 DAC it can't sound good and correct.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-measurements-of-audio-gd-r2r11-dac-amp.5779/
Coloration? It is seen on measurements. Listening tests quote "Importantly, there was NO coloration in response of Audio-gd". Yip, it came as a surprise after all measuring mess. But still no conclusion what was wrong.I don't care much about measurements THD etc, but if it has as high coloration as Audio-gd R2R11 DAC it can't sound good and correct.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-measurements-of-audio-gd-r2r11-dac-amp.5779/
Good and correct can be different things when describing music.