matthewh133
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
The good thing that my grandmother said I can trade, or sell and re spend anything I currently have, so that eases the "blow". I just cant spend more original money.
Ahhh. I guess that's not too bad then
The good thing that my grandmother said I can trade, or sell and re spend anything I currently have, so that eases the "blow". I just cant spend more original money.
When I heard the ZD I was none to impressed. This was however at meet conditions where impressions are always tinted by the noise and other unfamiliar gear. I would have to hear one again to get a better idea of what it actually sounds like.
And theres a reason the Luxmans still on the list... just remember were still 4.5 months away from graduation.
Thanks for the input.
Any reason you're opposed to Eddie Current? Having spoken with several of my contacts who know a hell of a lot more than I do about amplifiers (topology, parts, value, etc.) they are some of the best values in high end amps. Craig is doing some really revolutionary stuff with his designs. I'll look through a discussion I had about it, and post some of the relevant info if you're interested. I myself now own the Zana Deux SE and I'm utterly blown away by the quality for the price.
Quote:
Absolutely. Serious amp geeks usually build their own and/or buy Moth/Eddie Current gear. The Zana's circuit is rather different from anything else on the market and the build quality is excellent. I poked around and restored many old radios and assorted tube gear before getting into hi-fi. The Zana is built the same way the best gear was in the tube "golden age." Circuit aside, there's a whole different art to layout and construction that doesn't show up in schematics. Everything has to be laid out correctly, consideration given to heat, grounding and ground plane, and much else. The Zana gets all of this right, as well.
There are very few amps out there that hit on all cylinders the way this one does. You could probably count them on one hand.
I don't find much of a particular sound to the Zana, either. It certainly reveals whether I'm running tubes or solid state on the phono stage, but I find it neutral with the pretty darned neutral SACD player. It might be hard to appreciate this quality until you've spent awhile listening to colored gear. The colored stuff can be fun at first, but you eventually get tired of it. The thing about neutral gear is that it takes awhile before you notice how little it does wrong, because that quality won't jump out in your face on first listen.
The same thing happened to me when I started running the Quad ESL-63s. They don't jump out at you as spectacular. But disc after disc, hour after hour, you notice that the Quads don't screw anything up. They sound natural and wonderful throughout. It was nothing like when I got the RS-1s. Those were mind-blowing about 30 seconds in and I stayed up all night listening to them. Lots of fun and I loved them.
But then I eventually burned out on the RS-1. I kept going back to the HD-600. The HD-600 wasn't as exciting, but it gets pretty much everything right. I could listen for hours without getting distracted by coloration. And now, the HD-800 does the same for me.
So before I get way too off topic, give Eddie Current/Moth a chance. Always the most innovative, excellent build quality and the prices are a lot lower than what they could be.