Quote:
Originally Posted by Head Injury /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And so, unless research convinces me that cables can make an audible difference, no matter how small, I won't buy anything beyond my $31 (+ shipping) LC-1.
|
I am very curious with this comment. Lets just say, hypothetically, they found that there are indeed individuals that are documented to have been able to differentiate with 100 percent accuracy several cables in a DBT. Will you then be able to hear differences in your BJC cables, and start hearing differences in expensive ones too? Or will you be thankful that you are amongst the majority that have "less efficient" hearing and hence have no need for "cable tuning".
Remember there is absolute evidence that some headphones are technically better than others - but the majority (of the population) will never hear it that way. If I feel more healthier breathing country air than city air - yet there has not been one conclusive study to indicate that fresh country air will prolong my life one more day than breathing city air - am I wrong.
Will objectivists ever play the devil's advocate and ask themselves - "what if" conclusive evidence was found of human hearing being able to detect what equipment cannot. How will objectivists honestly react to this news. There can only be 3 possible outcomes.
1. An objectivist will "convert" and eventually start to hear differences for themselves. You are weak - the world does not belong to you it belongs to the strong.
2. An objectivist will be surprised - but not affected as he has never heard heard these differences, he knew then and he knows now, he knows he can't hear cable differences. You are strong - the world belongs to you.
3. An objectivist detest these new findings - he has tried in vain to hear differences and never could. He refuses to submit to the fact that someone is "better" than he. You are incredibly strong - the world belongs to you (don't shoot me on this one)
Everyone should ponder "what was" "what is" and "what if" - If you are honest with yourself then the answer is always "what ever".