[MCC]

Desktop:
HP LP2475W
24", 1920x1200 (16:10)
Non-glossy 102% gamut H-IPS Panel
6ms response, 1000:1 contrast
2x DVI-I, HDMI, DisplayPort, Component, Composite, S-Video

Laptop:
Thinkpad Z60t
14", 1280x768 (15:9...

)
Non-glossy TN panel

Both are calibrated to 2.2 gamma @ 6500K and the HP is at 120 cd/m^2 brightness. That translates to 19/100.

Edit:

Phone:
Ancient Cingular 8125 (HTC Wizard)
2.8", 320x240 (4:3)
Glossy TN panel

 

[Infoseeker]

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCC /img/forum/go_quote.gif Desktop: HP LP2475W 24", 1920x1200 (16:10) Non-glossy 102% gamut H-IPS Panel 6ms response, 1000:1 contrast 2x DVI-I, HDMI, DisplayPort, Component, Composite, S-Video

really nice monitor!

 

[jude]

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraseyboy /img/forum/go_quote.gif Oh right. I got 1280x800 mixed up with 1280x600 which is what my sisters Acer Aspire One's 9" screen runs at. I guess 1280x800 is just a smallish laptop?

fraseyboy, I'm guessing that sis is running at 1024 x 600. My Samsung NC10 (which I totally dig, by the way), runs 1024x600 on a 10.2" display.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCC /img/forum/go_quote.gif Desktop: HP LP2475W 24", 1920x1200 (16:10) Non-glossy 102% gamut H-IPS Panel 6ms response, 1000:1 contrast 2x DVI-I, HDMI, DisplayPort, Component, Composite, S-Video....

I use that same HP model in my home office.

I have an older Dell 2405FPW 24" display on my desk at my office office that also runs 1920x1200. It's not as nice as the HP, but it continues to serve me well.

I use both with my Macbook Pro 17" (late 2008 model), and occasionally with my Samsung netbook.

 

[Jasper994]

Samsung 24" 245BW
1920x1200

Poll Results = Adam, you need a new monitor...

 

[AdamCalifornia]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasper994 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Samsung 24" 245BW 1920x1200 Poll Results = Adam, you need a new monitor...

Thanks, you're right. All you guys have wide screen displays.

On another matter. - This might be interesting for some of you:
Trends — Monitors and Screen Resolution

From the above link:

Quote:

[size=xx-large]Web Design and Screen Resolution [/size] During the early days of the Web, we designed for a resolution of 640x480. As technology and color representation improved, the standard moved to 800x600, and many monitors are still shipped preset to this resolution. Web designers are gradually starting to design for a resolution of 1024x768 because a growing majority of Internet users can handle that resolution and more. [size=large]This Web site is designed for 1024x768[/size], and Buildtelligence is deliberately moving slowly towards [size=large]this new standard[/size].

Yet another link: Web Design Standards

From the above link: Quote:

The indusrty standard is 1024 x 768.

My Inane (by definition, because they're mine) questions:

1. What is the Head-Fi.org's (default) resolution by design?

2. Is the current internet standard really [size=large]1024x768[/size]?

See also this s'il vous plait.

Adam

 

[The-One]

27" Dell 2709W
1920x1200

 

[evilking]

17" widescreen desktop monitor at 1280x720, connected to a 17" widescreen laptop at 1920x1200.

 

[cash68]

My internet penis is gigantic.

 

[Al4x]

internet penis? please...no pics

what i really like about 1920x1200 is ability to fit 2 full browser windows side by side, ben used to a small [17in] screen i prefer sharpness over size [no jokes lol]

 

[jeffreyj900]

24" Dell Widescreen (Older model with USB and Memory Card slots on the side) LOVE it! Unfortunately, it won't work with my newly acquired MacBook Pro

1920x1200

 

[MaZa]

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCC /img/forum/go_quote.gif Desktop: HP LP2475W 24", 1920x1200 (16:10) Non-glossy 102% gamut H-IPS Panel 6ms response, 1000:1 contrast 2x DVI-I, HDMI, DisplayPort, Component, Composite, S-Video *snip* Both are calibrated to 2.2 gamma @ 6500K and the HP is at 120 cd/m^2 brightness. That translates to 19/100.

Same here, except I have calibrated it using my monitors native color temperature (best black depth and contrast that way) since I dont do any graphics editing and such, I'm a gamer but a demanding one. Gamma 2.2 and luminance varies from 120 to 140cdm2 depending in ambient lighting.

Kickass monitor.

 

[progo]

I do not have a 17" screen but two such things! Thus having a resolution of 2560×1024. All I can say it's very useful and IMO beats a single 1920x1080 screen any day. [size=xx-small]Except when watching movies.[/size]

I am not one of those who like to waste their screen space and surf with a full-screen browser. My window is usually about 1024×768, sometimes I fullscreen it. Perhaps then when I buy a third display.

A fresh picture: http://skeezu.net/~progo/kuvat/computerspot-090314.jpeg

 

[Al4x]

Quote:

Originally Posted by progo /img/forum/go_quote.gif I do not have a 17" screen but two such things! Thus having a resolution of 2560×1024. All I can say it's very useful and IMO beats a single 1920x1080 screen any day. [size=xx-small]Except when watching movies.[/size] I am not one of those who like to waste their screen space and surf with a full-screen browser. My window is usually about 1024×768, sometimes I fullscreen it. Perhaps then when I buy a third display. A fresh picture: http://skeezu.net/~progo/kuvat/computerspot-090314.jpeg

are those really 1920? cause that browser window looks too big

 

[Al4x]

Quote:

Originally Posted by progo /img/forum/go_quote.gif I do not have a 17" screen but two such things! Thus having a resolution of 2560×1024. All I can say it's very useful and IMO beats a single 1920x1080 screen any day. [size=xx-small]Except when watching movies.[/size] I am not one of those who like to waste their screen space and surf with a full-screen browser. My window is usually about 1024×768, sometimes I fullscreen it. Perhaps then when I buy a third display. A fresh picture: http://skeezu.net/~progo/kuvat/computerspot-090314.jpeg

are those really 1920? cause that browser window looks too big

edt, sorry, forgot this website resizes to browser size

 

[baglunch]

I have a couple 24" monitors, each at 1920x1200. One's better for photo (MVA), the other for gaming (TN)... although, I pretty much do everything on the MVA, as I don't really notice a difference in refresh time, and the colors are far, far better.