Thought so too.to me, that looks like youve messed up something on the software/firmware side. it looks like an algorithmic filter
But as it happens with different Software ans different Laptops...
Thought so too.to me, that looks like youve messed up something on the software/firmware side. it looks like an algorithmic filter
If your seal between your testing mic and your ba's have ANY opening no matter how small, you will lose bass while testing. Usually a notch like you show is caused by phase interference (incorrect polarity on one of your ba"s), but you saying its now gone sounds like a sealing issue.Just tested again. i changed nothing, but now the results are ok. don't know why. but will try to find out.
I used to have the revopoint pop2 but i exchanged it with someone who had the mini. The difference between the 2 scanners is notable, the mini is more detailed for small objects like earscans etc. In the photos below the scans that i used were cut and clean before the scan.Planning to get that too.mind sharing photos of your scans?
I ran the 20 Ωmind sharing tubing and crossovers? Would like your thoughts as that's at least 3 tubes......I've only managed a 1 mm and 2X2mm so far.
How are you measuring? I tend to ignore everything above around 8kHz as the measurements seem unreliable and there isn't much there anyway. The last time I checked I could only hear up to 14kHz so have never been too worried about that area.Hello guys,
I'm trying a build with x1 22955 x1 29689 x1 31736. I can't seem to get the highs to reach above 13k, any idea what I miss? I also tried center tapping 29689.
Can't reach 13k+
Have you seen this:it would be so useful to have a database of drivers and their fr/thd/characteristics with various tube lengths
maybe also a list of iems with known driver configs as well
How's the accuracy of the scaling? That's one of the things I was worried about back then.I used to have the revopoint pop2 but i exchanged it with someone who had the mini. The difference between the 2 scanners is notable, the mini is more detailed for small objects like earscans etc. In the photos below the scans that i used were cut and clean before the scan.
oh, this is fricking great. so helpful. thanks!Have you seen this:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jguxmYfEmZdHEGIUDvQUnfm3vhxo51WeNKKG0_oRtMA/pub?gid=0#
Last updated 3 years back, but it might be useful
It all depends on how accurately you scan the impressions. It's a bit difficult to get the right lighting and the scan software is still on the beta version but I managed to get pretty decent scans with ~0.1mm difference. Still on the way to get perfect scans though.How's the accuracy of the scaling? That's one of the things I was worried about back then.