Ivan TT
500+ Head-Fier
Bellsing 10013 impedances graphs:
1. Stock:
2. 25Ohm + 22uF Zobel:
1. Stock:
2. 25Ohm + 22uF Zobel:
Worked well for me, much appreciated!@Ivan TT Thank you so much for sharing. I am very happy you like the Bellsing 6, especially since I shamelessly advertised them here.
Yes, but I usually take some time to arrive at conclusions, since yesterday I have Bellsing 6 and 4xRAB with zobels so listening to both taking turns, what I CAN tell you is they have different signatures, but I like them both, no clear winner yet.Could you compare them to your 4xRAB/4xRAF setups?
Non-polar in Bellsing 6, polar 4.7uF tantalum in 4xRAB.Also, just out of curiosity: Are you using unpolarized caps, or did you use polarized caps in series with reversed polarity?
My knowledge of electronics is limited, but from what I know a polar cap has different behavior depending on the polarity of the voltage applied, which of course means they are not suited for AC. You can create an unpolarized cap from two identical polarized caps by connecting them in series in opposite polarity ( -||++||- or +||--||+ doesn't matter). The resulting capacitance is half of a single cap.I don't think it really matters as polar caps are used for DC decoupling in many HP amps and DAPs, but please tell me more about that reverse polarity approach?
Awesome, Thanks!Bellsing 10013 impedances graphs:
1. Stock:
2. 25Ohm + 22uF Zobel:
That looks better than some flagships....Bellsing 10013 impedances graphs:
1. Stock:
2. 25Ohm + 22uF Zobel:
which version are you trying to makeHey guys,
I'd like to try a 4× RAF build I've been looking for some schematics on here but I couldn't find anything, can anyone give me some more info ?
Thx
which version are you trying to make
4x RAF series parallel + zobel
or
4x RAF Series + zobel
it dependsSeries parallel, I don't think I can drive series, and series parallel was better right ?
it depends
Well signature wise, series is way better(of charts)
Electrical and distortion point, parallel is better
for tubing you can make 2 RAF's drivers share the single tube and get dual bore design or make it like @Ivan TT (the resonator)
for zobel (series parallel)
Cz = 4.6uF
Rz = 41 ohms
for zobel (Series)
ask @Ivan TT
or
Cz = 1uF
Rz = 165 ohms
for wiring series parallel
Wire 2 drivers in series and make a pair of dual driver
then wire them in parallel
and you will have a quad driver assembly
you have to connect zobel to this quad assembly
take that speaker as quad assembly
if going series parallel
add a 30ohm series resistor to the positive leg in between your connection(mmcx or 2pin) and zobel
speaker -> zobel -> series resistor -> connection
it depends
Well signature wise, series is way better(of charts)
Electrical and distortion point, parallel is better
for tubing you can make 2 RAF's drivers share the single tube and get dual bore design or make it like @Ivan TT (the resonator)
for zobel (series parallel)
Cz = 4.6uF
Rz = 41 ohms
for zobel (Series)
ask @Ivan TT
or
Cz = 1uF
Rz = 165 ohms
for wiring series parallel
Wire 2 drivers in series and make a pair of dual driver
then wire them in parallel
and you will have a quad driver assembly
you have to connect zobel to this quad assembly
take that speaker as quad assembly
if going series parallel
add a 30ohm series resistor to the positive leg in between your connection(mmcx or 2pin) and zobel
speaker -> zobel -> series resistor -> connection
i updated my post////Thanks !! I think I get my drivers in next week then I can do some experimenting, can't wait. Thanks again