Well I tried to let it lie, but:
1) Regardless of what the test shows Regal: You should be listening to music, not to tones. This 'skewing' is a well known part of NOS DACs. The best ones do it a negligible amount. Anyway, a DAC could measure the worst on earth and use a single
capsicum as its DAC chip, as long as it sounds like the best thing I've ever heard, these are irrelevant to me.... as long as I can buy replacement capsicums
BTW, a lightly modified DAC-AH is only just the tip of the iceberg WRT NOS DACs. A lightly modified Zhaolu would be equivalent in the OS world, and we all know they aren't overly special either in the grand scheme of things, so don't make generalisations based on that.
2) That quote from the 'ultimate nos dac' thread at diyaudio was taken way out of context. I got a reply from the guy who posted it cos I asked him about the thread, and he rattled off about 5-6 points of weakness each for OS and NOS DACs. The NOS points he explained were largely irrelevant in listening applications of DACs. And while the OS 'problems' are TECHNICALLY only of the same (sometimes even lesser) seriousness as the NOS problems when used in other applications, they are directly related to listening uses, and cannot be corrected by filtering or otherwise.
Let's let this thread go back to NOS recommendations for the OP.