I guess I'll contribute and share here some threads covering recent frequency response measurements:
https://www.reddit.com/r/headphones...a_organic_measurements_bk_5128_headphonescom/,
https://forum.headphones.com/t/hifiman-arya-organic-official-thread/21830?u=resolve
I personally enjoyed my Arya Stealth best with fine-tuned EQ as documented
here (post #4,665), EQ affording exceptional clarity and maybe even an increased sense of space without compromising the tonality of the 1 kHz to 2.5 kHz region which I prefer to fill toward Harman/diffuse-field ear gain. For me, the switch from the Arya Stealth's stock tonality to EQing close to Harman (including some tweaks done by ear) is the closest thing to sonically "lifting a veil" instead of sounding "congested" and "noisy".
For the latter link, one can compare the GRAS measurements further down with those for the Arya Stealth in
https://headphones.com/blogs/reviews/hifiman-arya-stealth-vs-arya-v2.
Theoretically, the bass quantity or extension shouldn't be all that different, but the upper bass and lower mids are tamed a bit closer to Harman which I've personally found enhances clarity and separation when EQing; I also suspect that it might actually be the taming of said upper bass and lower mids and its effect on people's choice of listening level that may be contributing to the sense of "more bass" despite the measurements; everything is relative. Otherwise, it's mostly very similar other than its being brighter in the upper treble and top octave, though like I had found with the Meze Elite, on real ears, you might actually with pink noise or sine sweeps hear a lack of peaks and hence the described "smooth treble". Otherwise, I have been quite skeptical of many subjective claims, else am less susceptible to described headphone phenomena, my having only really been truly wowed by surprising EQing results, or by exceptional recordings.
As for soundstage, I personally feel such as being predominately affected by the size of the earpads (e.g. I find the Meze Elite with hybrid pads very comparable to the Arya for "bigness" of sound), the rest being subjective effects of frequency response. For example, I agree that in some recordings, the 1 kHz to 2.5 kHz dip can contribute to a sense of distance, but to me, it sounds artificially applied as opposed to being true to the recording. I would also advise some form of volume matching lest one conflate "
louder" with "bigger". My Jabra Elite 85h can sound huge when playing very loud and textured tracks, but I agree that the relative smallness of the pads detracts from the experience or interferes/"intersects" with the perceived imaging of some tracks like those by Yosi Horikawa.
Personally, an upgrade from the Arya Stealth to the Arya Organic or anything higher would only be worth it if the 4 kHz resonance among others is tamed such that transients (e.g.
single-sample Dirac delta impulse) are both exquisitely sharp (The Arya Stealth's is currently the sharpest I've heard even compared to the Meze Elite, DCA Expanse, Final Audio D8000, and 2022 Focal Utopia, whereby I wouldn't be surprised if the Arya Organic does indeed sound sharper; I have yet to hear estats), but also exhibiting cleaner and faster decays; e.g. I've so far heard the cleanest decays out of the DCA Expanse and Final Audio D8000, but they didn't feel as sharp or incisive as the Arya with its thinner diaphragm. Likewise, any peaks when EQed away should be stable and not change position the next time you put the headphones on; theoretically, this enables the consistent EQing of smoother frequency responses such that no peaks or dips could mask any details in the recording; ideal tonal balance is sought after nailing that down. Furthermore, when listening to sine sweeps around said resonances, the image of the pure tones should not shift left and right, which theoretically hurts imaging accuracy. At least one fellow
here (post #4,313) reported the HE1000se as having the same issues I had identified in the Arya Stealth. These are issues I did not find with the Meze Elite despite having similar ear apertures.
Otherwise, if you don't have an Arya yet, sure, absolutely, the Arya Organic is an exceptional iteration which also compared to the Arya Stealth now uses a metal frame previously only found on the HE1000 and up. Once you hear huge planar presentation, there's no going back. Otherwise, for those already with Aryas, I highly recommend exploring the capabilities of good EQ implementations like
Equalizer APO and trying out filling dips and EQing away peaks, whereby I've found that the results in clarity and cleanness of sound could be astounding.
EQ recommendation:
I've attached an Equalizer APO PEQ profile for the Arya Stealth, though it should also be compatible with the Arya V2. "HiFiMan Arya V3 PEQ.txt" would go into Equalizer APO's "config" folder, whereby within that file, you would turn "HiFiMan Arya V3 - GRAS - neutral reference V1_1 - PEQ - export.txt" on and off for A-weighted volume-matched A/Bing.
To import the settings into another PEQ implementation like Roon's, transfer the filters within "HiFiMan Arya V3 - GRAS - neutral reference V1_1 - PEQ - export.txt"
except for the digital preamp one (unless you wish to recreate the Equalizer APO volume-matched A/Bing case, whereby you need to switch between having
no digital preamp when the EQ profile is enabled, and a -4.6 dB digital preamp when the EQ profile is disabled):
- PK: peaking filter
- HSC: high-shelf filter
- Fc: frequency center in Hz
- Gain: filter gain in dB
- Q: the Q factor
This EQ is best demonstrated with spectrally dense tracks. Consider changes in clarity and balance with
https://app.idagio.com/albums/chopin-piano-concertos-C0C964E3-A41E-458A-B6D6-661986CA4096,
, and
. This at the minimum tames violin stridence and what to me sounds like too much "noise" in the 6 kHz to 7 kHz region.