@
tonereef
That's because no one has, in a written review, through commenting or videos, has actually explained in detail what the sound stage of the heddphone exactly is like, compared to the usual headphones, planars etc.
There are some misconceptions about what the heddphone actually listens like in most of it's sound characteristics. Few have explained it, but it is obviously swiftly forgotten after thousand of comments ^^
It is not a dynamic, nor a planar, nor a electrostatic headphone.
Headfonia does not wanted to compare the heddphone with other headphomes because of that. But when no one does, how should others now?
Such simple distiches as "sound stage is wide, more wide, depth, more depth" are, ahem, are not really accurate, since sound stage is like 90 % psychoacoustics.
But that is what most are doing when describing it.
That said, I consider the HEDDphone's sense of air and
See, that is what I meant.
No offense pataburd, but that is such a vague description, no one except you can understand.
Especially when one thinks that "sense of air" means airiness, and is now expecting such a airy sound and open headphone like the hifiman planars.
Guess what? The heddphone isn't actually
that airy sounding as the the hd 800S or the hifiman planars.
It is just a different kind of airiness. Can't be compared. The heddphone achieves, for example the width of the sound stage, in a different way than those do.
The technical abilities are there; transducer resolution, perceived detail, transparency etc. to some degree more than with a lcd 3-f, on flagship level with the ones priced above.
But as you said there is no better, just different. More detail, more transparency, less here, less there.
In the the end the listeners decides what he likes most.
So don't hang up there, you made the right choice^^ Eventually just get more headphones