Quote:
Now I am sure your general impression is accurate and you remember what flaws/strengths you thought the headphones had, but that is a subjective preference. That is why I think that it is better for people trying to find headphones to read about a direct A/B comparison of the headphones' objective differences. Rather than just talking about your auditory recollection/personal impressions, you are comparing the sonic features that distinguish two headphones, which allows the person to demo one of those headphones, personally decide what they feel is the strength/weakness of those headphones, and conclude whether the sonic difference described in an A/B comparison for the alternative headphones is providing what they are looking for.
And one of the things that I've been trying to point out is that you cannot make an objective comparison between two subjective points, whether its done through direct A/B, auditory recollection or otherwise. If neither reference point A (a subjective impression), nor reference point B (another subjective impression) are fixed, one cannot be sure of determining a uniform difference between the two. It will be a subjective difference. This is because people will hear the two headphones differently, so they will also contrast the two headphones differently.
Consider the following questions between any two headphones. How are they different? To what degree is are there such differences? Just because you perceive a difference to a certain degree, does that mean that someone else will perceive the exact same difference to the exact same degree? Objectivity leaves no room for interpretation in such cases. And yet we know that people can (and have) disagreed on such matters.
I would much rather that we agree on direct A/B resulting in an increased chance of more accurately discerning subjective differences. But to say that those differences will be objective is stretching it way too far. You see where I'm going with this?
Quote:
I am a bit confused as you first say that you "generally don't remember every nuances of every headphones,"
I don't. I think that would be a bit of an outlandish claim for anyone to make, and I know that you agree.
Quote:
but now you seem to be implying that due to your ear training, extensive ownership of each headphone, and testing with various setups/sources that your "rough mental image of their signatures" does actually also include very detailed nuance descriptions of all the headphones that you owned.
Well now hold on, I don't believe I've made any personal claims about ear training or extensive ownership of headphones.
I made one reference to one pair of cans that I have (the Q701). And I did speak generally of audiophiles being better able to recollect impressions than the average Joe. But I don't believe I localized those comments to anyone, certainly not myself
But what I have been saying is that - short of whipping out graphs - all impressions are subjective. This includes impressions gained through direct A/B, as I've pointed out above. And if a direct A/B is not strictly required to yield substantially more information that would be relevant to the OP, then why not offer your impressions of the two right? I mean, you had already made the recommendation. Why not explain why you made the rec right?
I certainly don't think that the OP expected your impressions to be perfect or spot on. And I don't think he was expecting you to have any kind of objective data at all. Having either of those expectations would have been both unreasonable and unrealistic. But as he has heard neither, I'm sure your impressions would have helped him. No one, not you, not I, not anyone, is going to be able to give impressions that he can absolutely bank on... especially since he has different ears from everyone else in this thread. But more impressions do serve as more data points, which are helpful nonetheless. And you gotta admit bro, it took a quite a few posts (and
some effort) to finally yank some impressions out of ya.
On one hand, I wanna say WTG on being conservative about handing out casual impressions. But OTOH... DAYAM!
It's not we're asking you to divulge classified information or something there buddy!
EDIT: BTW, I don't really see this as an argument. It's more of a discussion where we happen to agree on some things and disagree on others. But I agree with not thread crapping too much here. I'd be happy to take this to PM if you like.
Then we can chat without feeling like we're intruding on everyone else. Cheers!