Quote:
Originally posted by Brad Harper
I was considering a level 1+ upgraded Music Hall CD25 or maybe a used Cary 308. Any help would be appreciated. Should I wait until I can afford Shanling?
I am currently using a NAD 541i, but I really hate the thin sound, although, it does sound good for HDCD. This would be placed in main rig with Audio Valve RKV MK2 and HD600/Cardas phones. |
Just basically went through this myself. I read allot of reviews both editorial and personal. Some of my conclusions.
A buddy of mine choose a Jolida CD Player (tube), compared to a level-1 mod Music Hall I believe a tube source is a better choice. Especially if you don’t have any tube equipment. Changing (rolling) tubes can greatly alter the sound. Tubes for sources or preamps are not expensive at all, even rare vintage tubes are cheap in retrospect.
If you feel the highs are too bright, change the tube. Bass too muddy? Change the tube. Basically the source can sound a dozen different ways by just swapping tubs of different brands. A Music Hall or Sony is going to sound the way it is and that’s it, good or bad. SACD and DVD-A are too analytical for my taste, no robustness or soul, if you mind. If you are living with a mid-fi home theater system with multiple speakers and subs, DVD-A, SACD or HDCD could be fun for a while. If you are building a fairly serious 2-channel system and already have hundreds of CD’s then you will not give a rats ass for SACD or any other new format after the 1-week novelty wears off. Soon enough DA converters will mature enough for the Hi-Fi market (if they haven’t already) but until recently even 20 and 24 bit processors were frowned upon.
I had a mid-fi Denon DVD Player (24/96) which sounded ok. I decided to look for a higher quality hi-fi DA component ‘used’ from eBay or Audiogon.com. For under $500 I found a very nice California Audio Labs DA converter with a single tube output stage fitted with a vintage Telefunken tube ($100+ value) and an excellent quality Burr Brown 24-bit/96kHz upgrade board. I use my existing DVD Player as a transport with a MIT Terminator3 digital cable. I also use the units optical input from my PC that blows any audio sound card – I also have an M-Audio Delta410 and a Revolution 7.1. The intel onboard digital optical out through a glass optical cable is 10X’s better.
I am not an audio snob and I do like the 24-bit Burr Brown converters, I think they are more detailed and have great imaging and presence. I could have found a more discrete dual tube DAC or player that was 18-bit or 20-bit for about the same as I spent, but as with all things, a 24-bit, dual tube DAC or Player from CAL or similar level brands were closer to $2000 new and still sell for half that or more used today.
I have a Bryston Preamp and a buddy of mine with the Jolida has a Conrad Johnson pre and a Headsave headphone amp. We both have Sennheiser HD600’s (he has the Zu Mobius cable and I’m still looking for one). In comparing the CAL DAC to the Jolida, I’d say there both surpurb and are very musical. He stuffed a set of vintage Mullard tubes in the Jolida and tried a handful of Russian, Asian and American tubes as well. Each tube had its own significant sound. My CAL with the Telefunken has great sound stage depth with very good bass extension and clarity, the Jolida with the Mullard has a more forcefull midrange for vocals with a fast high end and is also a transport.
From what I have read of people comparing these units with ones from Music Hall, Denon and Sony, even with modifications they don’t appear to have the level of robustness as a Carry or a Rouge. But then again, the price of these units are twice that. My California Audio Labs is about 3 years old and with its upgrades cost close to $1000 without a transport. A Jolida with Mullards is close to the same but sound more like $1500-$2000 players.
I think staying away from brands like Denon, Sony, NEC and the such is a step towards Hi-Fi. Brands like Music Hall can satisfy your taste for HiFi if that’s what you’re looking for but will lack the flexibility of a tube component. Brands like Rough and Shanling are very nice but come with a price.
BTW: the stock tubes that shipped with the Jolida are horrible. If I were to judge the sound of this player by the stock tube, I’d tell you it sucks!! But, pull the stock Asian tubes and stuff in a pair of 1960’s Mullards and you have something very special that the Music Hall can’t compare to. It will all NOW depend on what you listen to. If your taste is not that fussy and you like bright, in-your-face highs and listen to Metalica and/or classic rock exclusively, buy a Sony – You’ll love it. If your more into the hobby and like to listen with passion, tubes will give you the flexibility – more so then cable rolling, which is another story.
I listen to a very wide assortment of music. I love Led Zeppelin but adour Joss Stone and Frank Sinatra as well as Holly Cole and Vivaldi. It makes it even more difficult to find a happy medium. However, if I’m in a female vocalist mood I’ll leave my Telefunkens in place, if my choice of listening shifts to Led Zeppelin, Van Hallen and Judas Priest, then I may want to use a Russian tube. Its easy as pie to change and cheap enough. If my Music Hall sounds great playing Michael Buble but sucks with Janes Addition then I’m just ****ed. Know what I mean?