GUSTARD H10 High-current Discrete Class A output Stage Headphone Amplifier

Nov 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM Post #76 of 5,561
   
That's the thing with the HD800, it's head-and-shoulders more resolving than anything except perhaps for Stax gear, digging down into those low level signals where the "complex distortion" (as described by Nelson Pass) that's created by use of negative feedback in multi-stage designs can absolutely destroy the natural, open ambiance that I'm hearing currently - again, after 10 months of trying to get there.  Really, it's that wealth of low-level, micro-detailed information that resides just above a low-noise, transparent blackness, that can enhance your perception of space and imaging, and define the natural timbre of voices and instruments.  Though not due to negative feedback, I find the Schiit Vali to be especially good at destroying the timbre that distinguishes one voice from another or one brass instrument from another. People who recommend the Schiit Vali for use with the HD800 are just happy as can be to smother the excruciating resolution of the HD800 with a veil that, to my ears, makes everything have a similar timbre. It reminds me of my mother-in-law's preserves - blackberry,raspberry, strawberry - the way she makes them, they all taste the same!   And frankly, having had both the HD600 and the HD650, in my opinion, neither of them are, in themselves, sufficiently transparent to judge the transparency of upstream equipment.  Which can be a good thing, believe me!
 
OK, enough of rambling about the impact of negative feedback.  :-)
 
Mike

 
Sounds like you have been on a quest brother.  I too had a quest years ago (about 20 actually). I was in search of my personal Holy Grail of Tube amps. I embarked on a two year mission and well over twenty (yes, 20 --ridiculous!) amps passed through my listening room and I tried my best to comment on them in a series of articles I wrote for Positive Feedback magazine. For lack of a better name, I called it "Tube Fest", then "Son of Tube Fest" and then I think it was "Beneath the Planet of the Son of Tube Fest"..ha ha, you get the point, I was having fun and the quest was very personal. One of the most interesting amps I experienced was the Manley SE/PP 300B. I called this one the "lab experiment" because for the first time you could throw a switch on the same amp and hear the difference between Single Ended and Push-Pull operation.  The other slick lab experiment (and I know you are going to love this Mike) was a rotating knob that let you dial in negative feedback from 0 to 10db in 1 db steps.  This was an incredible eye, or should I say, ear, opener.  The differences in the sound were extraordinary and I had no idea how deletrious negative feedback would be. I found the draw backs of negative feedback to be several orders of magnitude greater than the SE/PP difference. As I dialed in more feedback, the soundstage depth decreased, like the doors closing on Mystery Science Theater 2000, the micro-dynamics got progressively sucked dry and the midrange bloom became a blip.  I also found feedback to be an equal opportunity spoiler – the effect was more dramatic when operating in SE, but it still ruined my day when in PP mode.    
 
By the way, I entirely agree with you that the real magic is found in the very low level information that rides very close to the noise floor. I used the "draining lake" analogy when writing about a wonderful amplifier that I actually described as my "Holy Grail" at the end of the "Tube Fest" pilgrimage. It was the Blue Circle BC-2 hybrid monoblocks that conjured up this lake analogy. What I said in that review was this:
 
"During my listening sessions, it was a common experience for me to detect a new sound and have to back track to confirm that it wasn't my imagination. It was as if I were sitting on a hill gazing out over a familiar lake, when slowly the water was drained and mysterious rocks, stumps and branches began to poke up through the placid surface. It was all very natural without surreal, in-your-face detail."

Ultra low distortion lets some pretty amazing stuff poke its head up out of the noise floor. But it’s not just the discreet little sonic events that are so captivating — it’s the generalized, pervasive sense of the acoustic space that really gets me. An almost continuous flow of subtle cues tells you about the size of the hall they’re playing in, who’s closer to the rear wall and sidewalls and what the relative humidity is. Just kidding about the latter, but you get my point — much of what I sense as "live" resides in and around the noise/distortion floor. The more you lower that floor, the more "live mojo" comes through.

I'm an old dog when it comes to the ultra high-end big rigs, but I'm almost virginal when it comes to the headphone scene, so you all need to be kind as my cherry is being popped, lol.  I do know enough to agree with you that the HD600's are not the ultimate resolving tool with which to ultimately judge and/or critique the upstream components transparency.  That being said, the fact that I CAN clearly hear these laudible characteristics of the H10, tells me that they must not be very subtle.  This H10 is at an "everyman" price and sounds fantastic with  quality "everyman" cans.  I obviously have no opinion on how it performs with the likes of the HD800 or LCD-3, but from what FlySweep has to say, I surmise that it scales up very nicely.

Regards,
Stu
 
Nov 6, 2014 at 3:56 PM Post #77 of 5,561
I'm coming from the same place. Some components just don't exhibit much of the break in effect, others do. This happens to be one that does in a rather significant way. I'm still somewhat skeptical of those that claim a component needs 150+ hours to sound it's best. In my experience (with everything except devices with a mechanical aspect, like loudspeakers) the vast majority of change occurs in the 20 to 50 hour range and anything after that is probably more wishful thinking and perspective adjustment.

The planar-like sound has got to be the vice grip control the ultra low output impedance H10 has on the Senn's drivers...not to mention the rather huge voltage swings and current this thing is capable of. I'm hearing it too. Words like "fast," "precise" and expressions like "stop on a dime," come to mind. All manor of distortions are reduced when that little diaphragm starts and stops the way it is supposed to. If the H10 can do this with the Senn, I can only imagine what it can do with a true planar dynamic. Ha ha, I won't have to imagine for long - the Hifimans are on their way.

 
I haven't heard the 400i.. but as far as the 560 is concerned, it sounded absolutely wonderful with the H10 (as did the LCD-2F).  Both those planars appreciated the copious amounts of clean current the H10 was practically begging to pump out.  As I understand it, the 400i is surprisingly efficient in terms of being able to reach ear splitting volumes from low power devices (i.e. portable DAPs, etc.).. but I bet you'd hear a welcome improvement in soundstage, driver control, resolving ability, and instrument separation with the H10.  If my experience with the H10/560 was any indication, you're in for a treat when the 400i arrives.
 
The only solid state amps that interest me at this point are the Schiit Ragnarok (but I don't see myself shelling out $1700 on a headphone amp anytime soon.. if ever).. and the Nuforce HA-200 (which Mike's paired with the HD800.. and raved about).  I do have a loaded Geek Pulse coming at sometime in the near future.  I backed it very early (last year).. long before finding the H10.  It'll be fun to see how it compares to the H10.. it'll most likely take on DAC duties.. and if its HP output is better than the H10, I'll consider it icing on the cake.  Aside from all that, the H10 simply off all the boxes for me.  I'd like to compare it to the Schiit Mjolnir if I ever get a chance, too.
 
Nov 7, 2014 at 1:40 PM Post #78 of 5,561
A big thanks to you Flysweep, Jeff, Mike, kyno... I wouldn't have discovered and purchased the H10 without you guys!

Last night's listening session was even better than the night before. I am more than satisfied with the H10's performance and I am convinced that it will be the right tool for further headphone explorations. The best $350 I ever spent on an amp!
 
Nov 8, 2014 at 3:20 AM Post #79 of 5,561
 
I'm impressed how you manage to make me love the H10 even though I don't have it yet 
biggrin.gif

 
I still got the HD-650 and will definitely keep it for comparaison with other headphones. Didn't you have/heard it with a Crack before? (someone was mentioning this in page 1) The comparaison would be interesting, albeit audio memory isn't our strongest suit.

 
Haha.. well, I hope you love it even more when it arrives.  Regarding the Crack.. yes, I had a custom built Crack (w/ speedball and various other components that were upgraded (pot, output & PS bypass caps, etc.).  I had it for over a year with my (first) HD650.. but old it near the beginning  of this year.. so it's been quite some time since I've heard it.. but it was absolutely gorgeous sounding w/ the 650.  I can tell you the H10 and my Crack certainly shared some general qualities (i.e. warmth).. but.. and I'm going purely off memory here.. the H10 is more resolving, faster, cleaner, and more transparent than my Crack.  The Crack is a terrific OTL.. I'd say its hallmark qualities is a very hypnotic soundstage and excellent dynamics.. but it does many many others things very well.. it isn't the most resolving amp, though.  I realized something funny and ironic while (just now) reflecting on my tube rolling adventures with the Crack.. the tube/sound I was after is precisely what I'm hearing with the H10... haha.
 
Originally Posted by stuartmc /img/forum/go_quote.gif
 
[size=12.8000001907349px]Sounds like you have been on a quest brother.  I too had a quest years ago (about 20 actually). I was in search of my personal Holy Grail of Tube amps. I embarked on a two year mission and well over twenty (yes, 20 --ridiculous!) amps passed through my listening room and I tried my best to comment on them in a series of articles I wrote for Positive Feedback magazine. For lack of a better name, I called it "Tube Fest", then "Son of Tube Fest" and then I think it was "Beneath the Planet of the Son of Tube Fest"..ha ha, you get the point, I was having fun and the quest was very personal. One of the most interesting amps I experienced was the Manley SE/PP 300B. I called this one the "lab experiment" because for the first time you could throw a switch on the same amp and here the difference between Single Ended and Push-Pull operation.  The other slick lab experiment (and I know you are going to love this Mike) was a rotating knob that let you dial in negative feedback from 0 to 10db in 1 db steps.  This was an incredible eye, or should I say, ear, opener.  The differences in the sound were extraordinary and I had no idea how deletrious negative feedback would be. I found the draw backs of negative feedback to be several orders of magnitude greater than the SE/PP difference. As I dialed in more feedback, the soundstage depth decreased, like the doors closing on Mystery Science Theater 2000, the micro-dynamics got progressively sucked dry and the midrange bloom became a blip.  I also found feedback to be an equal opportunity spoiler – the effect was more dramatic when operating in SE, but it still ruined my day when in PP mode.    [/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px] [/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px]By the way, I entirely agree with you that the real magic is found in the very low level information that rides very close to the noise floor. I used the "draining lake" analogy when writing about a wonderful amplifier that I actually described as my "Holy Grail" at the end of the "Tube Fest" pilgrimage. It was the Blue Circle BC-2 hybrid monoblocks that conjured up this lake analogy. What I said in that review was this:[/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px] [/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px]"During my listening sessions, it was a common experience for me to detect a new sound and have to back track to confirm that it wasn't my imagination. It was as if I were sitting on a hill gazing out over a familiar lake, when slowly the water was drained and mysterious rocks, stumps and branches began to poke up through the placid surface. It was all very natural without surreal, in-your-face detail."[/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px]Ultra low distortion lets some pretty amazing stuff poke its head up out of the noise floor. But it’s not just the discreet little sonic events that are so captivating — it’s the generalized, pervasive sense of the acoustic space that really gets me. An almost continuous flow of subtle cues tells you about the size of the hall they’re playing in, who’s closer to the rear wall and sidewalls and what the relative humidity is. Just kidding about the latter, but you get my point — much of what I sense as "live" resides in and around the noise/distortion floor. The more you lower that floor, the more "live mojo" comes through.[/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px]I'm an old dog when it comes to the ultra high-end big rigs, but I'm almost virginal when it comes to the headphone scene, so you all need to be kind as my cherry is being popped, lol.  I do know enough to agree with you that the HD600's are not the ultimate resolving tool with which to ultimately judge and/or critique the upstream components transparency.  That being said, the fact that I CAN clearly hear these laudible characteristics of the H10, tells me that they must not be very subtle.  This H10 is at an "everyman" price and sounds fantastic with  quality "everyman" cans.  I obviously have no opinion on how it performs with the likes of the HD800 or LCD-3, but from what FlySweep has to say, I surmise that it scales up very nicely.[/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px]Regards,[/size]
[size=12.8000001907349px]Stu[/size]

 
I absolutely love the "lake draining" analogy, Stu.  That's precisely how I'd describe resolution that's "done right."  The HD800 fits into this whole deal in a unique way: it's pretty merciless.  So, careful matching of upstream components is necessary to preserve that terrific precision, but present it in the most natural way possible.. and I think this is the rabbit hole I never quite committed to go down.  I may have to give it another shot (buy the HD800 again) cause it seems there's some pretty affordable options out there now.  When I had the HD800 (about a year ago), the Schiit Vali, Valhalla 2 weren't around.. I didn't know about the H10 (still don't know how it'll pair with the HD800, though).. and I hadn't heard about the HA-200).
 
Mike's sent me a lot of great reading on negative feedback (much of which I'm still making my way through).  One amp that I owned in the past, the Objective2, (I believe) used a lot of negative feedback to achieve some of its design goals (chiefly, to create a transparent amp that relied exclusively on measured performance).. and while the amp did sound decent (good not great), there was something about the treble that never sat quite right with me.. I sensed grain and a lack of focus in that region.. I wonder if that's a consequence of negative feedback or something else?
 
A big thanks to you Flysweep, Jeff, Mike, kyno... I wouldn't have discovered and purchased the H10 without you guys!

Last night's listening session was even better than the night before. I am more than satisfied with the H10's performance and I am convinced that it will be the right tool for further headphone explorations. The best $350 I ever spent on an amp!

 
Great to hear, Stu.  Thanks for taking a chance on it.. I'm very happy (and relieved!) it's worked out for you, so far.  I'm in love with how clean and composed the H10 sounds.  It's really well suited for lengthy listening sessions.. and frankly, that's a bit of a feat (to my ears) b/c a lot of solid state amps I've heard with the HD650 made it sound boring over lengthy listening sessions.  I don't have to worry about that with the H10.  One other thing I've noticed.. the H10 can be pretty jaw dropping when fed high quality/well recorded music.  For how well it gets on with less-than-ideally recorded material, it's more than capable of stepping up to the plate and rocking one out of the park when it's given a chance to show the finesse it has to go along with it's muscle.
 
Nov 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM Post #80 of 5,561
I am 650/Crack fan and Flysweep's statements are definitely high praise for the H10. The Project Ember and Project Polaris had picked my interests but the H10 seems like  a better choice! My suffering wallet would also be more than delighted to get out of the tube rolling madness ;-)
 
Nov 9, 2014 at 5:18 PM Post #81 of 5,561
Hey Stuart!
 
I love the way you write!  
biggrin.gif

 
  These must have been really fun to play with...
 
  One of the most interesting amps I experienced was the Manley SE/PP 300B. I called this one the "lab experiment" because for the first time you could throw a switch on the same amp and hear the difference between Single Ended and Push-Pull operation.  The other slick lab experiment (and I know you are going to love this Mike) was a rotating knob that let you dial in negative feedback from 0 to 10db in 1 db steps.  This was an incredible eye, or should I say, ear, opener.  The differences in the sound were extraordinary and I had no idea how deletrious negative feedback would be. I found the draw backs of negative feedback to be several orders of magnitude greater than the SE/PP difference. As I dialed in more feedback, the soundstage depth decreased, like the doors closing on Mystery Science Theater 2000, the micro-dynamics got progressively sucked dry and the midrange bloom became a blip.  I also found feedback to be an equal opportunity spoiler – the effect was more dramatic when operating in SE, but it still ruined my day when in PP mode.    

 
In the interest of being open-minded, fair, and balanced, etc., there's an article out there somewhere, that someone quoted not long ago - I can't find it at the moment - where the author makes a very compelling case for applying 80 or 100dB of negative feedback instead of the usual 20 or 30dB to multi-stage amps.  I can't recall the technical aspects, but he argues that this pushes multi-stage distortion down so far below your peak levels that you can't possibly hear the artifacts created down there through use of negative feedback.  The moral of the story seems to be:  Use no feedback...  or use a ton of feedback...
 
biggrin.gif

 
Mike
 
Nov 11, 2014 at 6:26 AM Post #82 of 5,561
Ordered one from Aliexpress, do they clone a clone? :smiley:
 
Nov 11, 2014 at 3:19 PM Post #83 of 5,561
Ordered one from Aliexpress, do they clone a clone? :smiley:

Ha ha...anything is possible, but I doubt anyone would bother to copy the H10.  Nice to see you over here Lukeap69. I'm using my Hidizs AP100 as a transport into the new Aune S16 and running it in dac mode balanced into the H10. The sound quality of this amp is just amazing for me and I hope you have a similarly great experience with it.  The  gain dip switches allow me to tailor the output to match everything I currently have for listening. That would be the Havi B3 Pro iem, the Sennheiser HD600 and as of yesterday, the Hifiman He-400i. If you have been following along with this thread, you already know that break in is critical with the H10, so don't shoot yourself over the buying decision until you have at least 30 to 50 hours in. Then hold onto your hat, because this rascal opens up and blooms like a spring flower - quite extraordinary for a solid state as compared to a great hollow state. Be sure to report back to us with your listening impressions.
 
The He-400i i got yesterday already had over 100 hours on it, so I was able to do some critical listening right away.  FlySweep you were so right - I'm getting a real treat with the H10 paired with a planar magnetic.  The H10 controls the panel like nobody's business.  I know this to be true because the distortion level is way down and its the draining lake analogy times two.  As compared to the HD600, there are improvements across the board, but the most noticeable is the clarity of low level detail. It's like a slight haze or veil has been lifted. This clarity is not frequency dependent either. Sometimes a hyped treble response can initially fool me into thinking that I am getting higher resolution....nope, not the case here.  The bass lines are better defined, no overhang, so less bloated and the midrange has more immediacy and palpable presence. Perhaps a slightly warmer sound than the HD600 (in the midrange) with just a little more sparkle and air up top.  The soundstage is just slightly narrower than on the HD600, no correct that, it's not really narrower, its just that everything is brought a little closer and that change made me intially think it was narrower. When I critically listened for width cues, it was all there with 400i. Depth of field is clearly better portrayed by the 400i. I can distinguish layers going all the way back that just elude me when I listen with the HD600.  With my current setup and paired with the H10, there is no doubt in my mind that the 400i is the better can.  Clarity, tonal balance and soundstaging are all superior.  As Mike has suggested, this can has the kind of resolution that helps me hear more of what is happening with the upstream components.
 
Nov 11, 2014 at 9:38 PM Post #84 of 5,561
Thanks Stuart. I'm sure I will enjoy the H10. I am planning to use mainly with iMac>Audio-gd NFB-1>H10. I will also connect AP100, X5 or Theorem 720. I've read about the burn-in period and have no problem with it. I will also compare it to my Lyr2, the hybrid tube amp which sounds like an SS amp. Funny that it seems H10 is an SS amp that sounds like a tube amp. :smiley:
 
Nov 13, 2014 at 10:47 PM Post #87 of 5,561
Have had this amp for a little while now. Amazing value for money, sounds fantastic with both my HD800 and LCD2. Love the large volume control.


Hi!

How long is "a little while?"

Which DAC are you using?

Is your HD800 modded?

Do you find you can listen to the HD800 for long periods as easily as you can the LCD-2, without fatigue?

Thanks!

Mike
 
Nov 14, 2014 at 7:56 PM Post #88 of 5,561
I received mine!! 
atsmile.gif

 
First off, I'd like to thank pollychen0306 (http://www.ebay.fr/itm/261520921654?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1439.l2649).
 
I was a bit hesitant to buy from abroad, but people here made me took the leap of faith with this shop and I really don't regret it. Great communication. Great packaging, very secure. Good product. Buying from them is a no-brainer. 
I'm also confident there won't be any issue with the 1 year warranty if I must ever use it.
 
I have an O2 and a Garage 1217 Polaris to compare it with. All of them running through an ODAC (O2/ODAC Epiphany combo in a single unit, so I'm using one more cable, 2xRCA to 3,5 jack, when listening to another amp than the O2), and an AMB Labs Gamma2 soon. 
 
All of that with an HD-650. Beyerdymanic T1 coming in next week.
 
Please note it has only been playing for about 10h so it's still in burn-in process. If I trust the few comments here, it hasn't really bloomed yet.
 
Funny thing is that it may have changed a little already.
When I first received it, I was in complete agreement with a comment made here, it felt a bit like a Super-O2, a more "powerful" sound, whereas the Polaris sounded softer/smoother than both O2 and Gustard H10, but with less clarity/details. Granted I only compared them 1 minute on 2 tracks, didn't have much time then 
biggrin.gif

 
It now sounds closer to the Polaris when it comes to smoothness, the O2 being rougher on the edges. I also hear a veil compared to the O2 (more bloated), bringing a worse instruments separation. I can definitely say that vocals and instruments currently sounds more true to life on the O2 because of this.
Right now, I'd say I'd like for the H10 to "open-up". In Cosmo Canyon from FFVII, the high note (flute) going on for almost all the track sounds nice with the O2, a bit bloated with the Polaris, kind of in a box with the H10.
It's almost like you can hear a great potential, covered with a blanket.
 
The O2, however, is missing resolution/quality in comparison. I'd say it has more grain, although I'm not sure if it's the right term
biggrin.gif
 In any case, I have a harder time listening to the O2 at low volume, I always feel to push the sound to a certain volume for it to sound decent. H10 or Polaris are fine in this regard.
 
Again, keep it mind it's not burn-in yet. I'll probably let in run for the next few days until my T1 arrives so that it quickly reaches 100 hours, but I felt it was a good thing to write preliminary impressions.
 
I'm also listening with an HD-650, which already sounds a bit too veiled/bloated (maybe even too dark/warm) to my ears, so anything taking it further in this direction wouldn't be the best thing as far as it concerns me (hence my wish to try the T1 with a good amp, and eventually the new HiFiman's & HD-800).
I probably would have been very happy with something to calm down my super bright/sibilant T90 when I tried it a while ago 
k701smile.gif
 
 
Nov 14, 2014 at 10:53 PM Post #89 of 5,561
Thanks Kyno. Looking forward to your further impression after burn in and also with the T1. It seems your early impression is consistent with others.
 
Nov 15, 2014 at 4:36 AM Post #90 of 5,561
Has anybody tried this amp with AKG Q701?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top