Has anyone of you ever did a blind comparison of R26 and any other dacs? With RME ADI-2 on my nearfield setup I've always had that feeling of instruments being congested and put on completely flat soundstage with not really natural timbre whatsoever. When I plugged in R26 I never even listened to ADI-2 again because I had had the RME for a couple of months before and I knew what it sounded like, R26 immediately solved all of the issues I had with RME and I've been 100% satisfied with R26 since I got it, never again did I have a need to change my dac. Now everything always sound exactly how I wanted it too, never feeling uncomfortable as I did with RME.
That being said...
I once brought it to my friend's who has RME in his home stereo, and despite of matching the levels only by ear I was mostly not able to discern these dacs. In one case of a good orchestral recording I was sure that R26 was playing because of its more precise imaging, but other than that I guessed wrong, even though I knew the traits of both dacs very well. I have to note that I'm not very much familiar with his setup's sound and I never liked it. Nevertheless it made me wonder if dacs really make a difference or it's just bias...
That being said...
I once brought it to my friend's who has RME in his home stereo, and despite of matching the levels only by ear I was mostly not able to discern these dacs. In one case of a good orchestral recording I was sure that R26 was playing because of its more precise imaging, but other than that I guessed wrong, even though I knew the traits of both dacs very well. I have to note that I'm not very much familiar with his setup's sound and I never liked it. Nevertheless it made me wonder if dacs really make a difference or it's just bias...
Last edited: