BShaw
1000+ Head-Fier
Dacwizard - I'm happy for you that you will save your money by not buying a clock, but if you haven't A/B'd one yourself in your system, I assume it can only be conjecture or tribal-speak ala ASR that qualifies you to categorically cast using an external clock as "bonkers" as you said earlier. Yes there are a lot of people here who've inserted an external clock into their chains, and most of us seem to be happy with the result. That's not a scientific survey, but it's one of the easiest tweaks to A/B with the R26, and I've done it, barely seconds between one and the other, and it was obvious the clock made a difference in my system that was very pleasing.Where do you get this rubbish from? I have no such issue from toslink and never have And can play 192khz files with no problem or jitter. The only people having issues with stuttering (which is what I said about LAN) are those using LAN, read back in the thread, dozens of users have had stuttering issues using LAN.
When someone says something verifiable factually untrue {toslink…caps resolution at 96khz on audio signals}, and then deliberately tries to misrepresent what I said, then it is a reason for dispute and shows said person doesn’t know what they are talking about.
@camrector How come you aren’t using an external clock? There are dozens on this thread that seem to think it’s a huge improvement, surely that proves it must be?
We don't need religious arguments in this thread, or throwing shade with passive aggressive comments like "That’s up to them, it’s their time and money but Id rather spend the time listening to music." Poor form to say it's all good and I'm happy for you and then in the same breath call other peoples' decisions basically stupid from your high plateau.
I think one of the problems in the beginning of this whole distraction was that you claimed toslink to be the best without comparing it to at least a somewhat optimized LAN implementation, and the suggestion of trying the FMCs or Sajunky's repeaters were attempts to point this out. If you think an undisclosed, I'm assuming garden variety, 26meter long LAN cable running from a router into the Gustard is going to show you the LAN input at its best, well, ok, but I'm saying you might achieve higher performance if you were willing to try something different rather than cast the idea(s) and by extension those who've tried them, as idiotic.
Last edited: