Oh for sure no offense taken or given!Those emails are even clearer than I recalled!
Btw I would say although @sajunky can be a bit blunt at times (much like some Saffa mates of mine!) he is a knowledgeable and well intentioned guy who makes valuable contributions to a number of other threads I'm on. So I'm always interested in his take.
This discussion and a bit if challenge is always healthy if we can try to keep it chilled - maybe @m-i-c-k-e-y could sticky the outcomes (schematics, Gustard emails... anything else) on his OG post.
About a 1000 posts back when I went deep down the R26 rabbit hole, I was totally bummed to find this information out.
They could have done the multibit DSD within the FPGA or added another Delta modulator.
They choose to have only a direct unchanged 1bit DSD path. Just like with NOS pcm.
I can understand the reasoning. You can upsample in software and have the R26 play that purely untouched.
To me all these DSD conversion are messy and each stage stands the chance to change the high frequency response making it slightly brighter or muted. And what to do with all the ultrasonic information in DSD in these format conversions. It is like taking four pre-amps of different designs and cascading them together.