Nada
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Posts
- 403
- Likes
- 203
I think it more likely that would be as a result of the greater precision, lessened temporal blurring resulting in a purer transient signal being amplified and then recreated by your speaker drivers
Thats a smart explanation. Unfortunately, any DAC that processes 768KHz has a temporal response in the sub microsecond range, regardless of jitter effects from different clocks. So that explanation doesn't make sense.
Is there a way to use a meter of any sort to test what output volumes (or maybe voltages) the Gustard emits when different settings are used (e.g. the external clock)?
Louder volume differences dominate perceived sound improvements.
With decibel meters you can volume match but not to high accuracy.
If you have a very good multimeter, measure the DC Vout on the balanced XLR pins with a DC -6dBFS signal with the amps unplugged:
![1670584682383.png 1670584682383.png](https://cdn.head-fi.org/a/11930795.png)
https://www.wavtones.com/functiongenerator.php
If there is any V change then Gustard have pulled off a VW inspired software hack.
![Headphone Smile :) :)](https://cdn.head-fi.org/e/headfi/smily_headphones1.gif)
Last edited: