Emphasis (
in red) is mine:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFKMan23
It is worthy of note that recently, a thread that basically dealt with the level of customer service from another reputable company (at least in the eyes of head fi) was deleted with the caveat from a moderator to keep such comments to the feedback forum. Luckily the poster in question did copy his comments in that person/company's feedback thread.
So while your (ie: MarconiSalad's) sentiments are understandable, it seems that the moderators/Jude feels otherwise about where such comments shoud go.
|
This is a lot to get my arms around, so let's try to look at this bit by bit:
I'm pretty sure that I know the thread of which you are speaking. If it's the one I'm thinking of, it was different than this one in that the
thread starter wanted to post something more suited to a feedback thread in the amp forum. This is easy clean-up: the post goes to the feedback forum and that's the end of it. There is no "luck" involved.
BTW - your comment seems to imply some kind of intent. I'll assume that it was nothing more than poorly chosen words and that you meant nothing by it for the moment.
As you also noted, this thread started out in one place, and moved to another. We're discussing right now how to deal with stuff like this, but it presents some difficult issues. Should we simply delete this thread (and others like it...and there ARE others) alltogether, or simply any and all posts critical of this (or any) vendor, with the directive that all such posts must be made in a feedback thread? That becomes a bit much to manage when your forum has more than 5 or 6 people logged on at a time, don't you think?
I'm leaning towards stuff like this being exclusively in the feedback thread, but as you can see it's not easy to administer. As I said, we're discussing it right now.
This thread frankly presents some sticky issues. This is not the first time that this issue has come up, and there are some folks who feel pretty strongly that this discussion ought to be had in a more public arena (e.g. an amp forum). The last such thread, BTW, was in fact locked...which is where this one may end up before long. Like I said, we're talking about it right now.
We've had other instances where SEVERE customer service issues came up, and we permitted the discussion to occur in areas other than the feedback forum (with stickies in the feedback forum to give special attention). To be clear: I'm
not saying this is one of those instances...just making the case that it's not so easy to be completely black or white in these circumstances about what goes where. It's even more difficult when a thread evolves one way or another, as opposed to an opening post that clearly belongs in a feedback thread.
That said, as you apparently feel at ease speaking for the moderators, please note the following:
Quote:
Originally Posted by elrod-tom
I agree...the right place for much of the discussion in this thread is the feedback forum.
|
BTW - I still feel that way. That said, we have lots and lots of discussion about reliability issues. Does this belong in the amp forum, or the feedback forum? What about posts relating to resolution of these issues? Again, it's not so black and white, now is it??
I know it's easy to be critical sometimes. It's a big forum, and a lot goes on behind the scenes that ordinary members never even see. As a moderator who has made a point that much of this discussion belongs in the feedback forum, it would be nice to be given the benefit of the doubt.