- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Posts
- 3,505
- Likes
- 248
Quote:
Now go to the LCD-2 thread and shout "Get the LCD-3!"
get TH-900!!!
Now go to the LCD-2 thread and shout "Get the LCD-3!"
get TH-900!!!
get TH-900!!!
If you have allot of disposable income.
Or if you don't and are obsessed with the TH900 sound![]()
For me, there was no question.
Of course the comparison to the bigger, shinier brother will always haunt the TH-600 -- while it is a simply amazing headphone in its own right.
I have my reasons for owning both, but would I have to decide with any kind of budget on mind it would be the TH-600 for sure.
Today I just had time for a very short comparison, using titles I normally listen to (i.e. EDM and electronica). The TH-900 has more sparkle and a bit stronger bass, while the TH-600 is somewhat more neutral -- so far I can only second other reviews comparing the two brothers.
The TH-900 emphasizes the upper (male) voice a bit more than the TH-600 and therefore brings out a bit more upper mids / treble detail. The TH-600 on the other hand makes it easier for me to hear details in the lower bass as its a bit less forward. Both give room and let details stand on their own, however massive the bass may hit at the same time.
Overall I think the TH-900 shows off its amazing control more than the TH-600 which seems less tuned to impress while still preserving the good traits of the Fostex drivers.
Source: 256kBit AAC and Apple Lossless out of a Macbook Air, DAC: Meridian Explorer, Amp: Lake People G109P
3 Grand on 2 headphones, 300 dollar dac.
Not that price is the most important thing but c'mon sell one of those and get a decent dac.
Your weak spot should not be the source.
3 Grand on 2 headphones, 300 dollar dac.
Not that price is the most important thing but c'mon sell one of those and get a decent dac.
Your weak spot should not be the source.
3 Grand on 2 headphones, 300 dollar dac.
Not that price is the most important thing but c'mon sell one of those and get a decent dac.
Your weak spot should not be the source.
Probably catch some flac for this but I think the whole "source is the most important" argument is getting quite dated. Encoders are soo much better nowadays and while I'm using dj carts my 320kbps mp3's sound just as good as my real vinyl. I also can not tell any difference between lossless and 320kbps and have bought the same track from beatport in both formats. No difference running what I think is pretty highend headphone equipment. If this were 5 years ago I would say yeah a dac is important but now I think you will see more performance for your dollar out of an amp, ear pad swap, headband swap. Plus the ear pad and headband swap will also improve the comfort. Technology has come a long way from the days of napster and most of the labtops I have tried at least in the last 2 years have great (for the most part) sound cards already installed.
Also price is only part of the equation. Plenty of great and dud dac products in their respective price ranges.