Hutnicks
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2012
- Posts
- 6,625
- Likes
- 595
Quote:
I'm sure Michael would have rather not hit that wall
The problem with overtaking is very simple. It's pure cost benefit analysis. If there is a risk of losing position you do not do it as you will never get those spots back.
You need to look at F1 in the way the teams do. It is not about individual races it is about where the team stands at the end of the season and how much revenue is shared out to them. There is a very real co dependance issue between the teams and F1 management and that is dictating what goes on in each individual race.
I've decided not to quote all the posts since it would make a very long one, but let's just say I agree with pretty much everything that's been said.
The FIA has to choose between "technology" or driver pressure.
My argument about the engineers not being able to think out of the box was more about hypocrisy than anything. We say that we restrict technology to level the sport?NeweyVettel won 3 titles in a row. 'nuff said.
It's not about the drivers anymore.
I don't get why they don't overtake, as their lives are not at risk. Schumi hit a wall 200+ KMh and he ended up with a broken leg...
The best compromise for me would be 80's cars with nowadays security. That would bring skills back in the game.
I'm sure Michael would have rather not hit that wall
The problem with overtaking is very simple. It's pure cost benefit analysis. If there is a risk of losing position you do not do it as you will never get those spots back.
You need to look at F1 in the way the teams do. It is not about individual races it is about where the team stands at the end of the season and how much revenue is shared out to them. There is a very real co dependance issue between the teams and F1 management and that is dictating what goes on in each individual race.