Mar 26, 2025 at 2:10 AM Post #9,751 of 9,764
GEC6080 with a Valvo (Philips print) ECC81 from 1954, red tip. Sounds great.

IMG_7138.jpg


IMG_7136.jpg


Chatham 6AS7G and Siemens frame grid E283CC. Nice.
 
Mar 26, 2025 at 6:29 AM Post #9,752 of 9,764
GEC6080 with a Valvo (Philips print) ECC81 from 1954, red tip. Sounds great.

IMG_7138.jpg

IMG_7136.jpg

Chatham 6AS7G and Siemens frame grid E283CC. Nice.

I really like the Chatham 6AS7G. Lately, they have been getting more amp time than the 5998s.
 
Mar 26, 2025 at 9:18 AM Post #9,753 of 9,764
I really like the Chatham 6AS7G. Lately, they have been getting more amp time than the 5998s.
I like the Chatham a lot myself. I slightly prefer the TS 5998 in my particular amp, but the Chatham is my favorite of any 6AS7G I've tried.
 
Mar 26, 2025 at 10:40 AM Post #9,754 of 9,764
I like the Chatham a lot myself. I slightly prefer the TS 5998 in my particular amp, but the Chatham is my favorite of any 6AS7G I've tried.

Well, the 5998 is great as well, but lately it's been the Chatham 6AS7.
 
Mar 29, 2025 at 7:56 PM Post #9,757 of 9,764
I asked earlier for opinions on the Sylvania 6080 and got some helpful responses, but just ended up buying two variations of the tube to draw my own conclusions.

I ended up getting a triple mica, yellow lettering (early 70's?) version of the tube, basically same one as in pic from @MDR30, and what I assume by the lettering and logo to be a late 50's to early 60's 2 mica 6080 Gold Brand version - same one as in pic from @JKDJedi )

I liked both, but think the vintage 6080 Gold Brand is noticeably superior.

For around $15 USD the vanilla 6080 was far better than I expected it to be, given some feedback I had seen on the tube. It's a bargain at that price.

To my ears what you get by upgrading to the vintage Gold Brand tube is deeper / more powerful bass and better instrument separation. It just has a cleaner sound if that makes sense. This is not to say the regular 6080 is bad by any means. It's better than a number of similar tubes I've tried at a higher cost.

I am reselling the plain 6080 and one of two 6080 GB's I picked up since I ended up buying a matched pair, as there were not a lot of great options for singles (and my amp only requires one). The Sylvania 6080 Gold Brand is most definitely a keeper!

I would place the vintage Sylvania 6080 Gold Brand right up there with the Tung Sol 5998 and the Chatham 6AS7G as my favorite tubes of this type. Your mileage may vary.
 
Last edited:
Apr 8, 2025 at 12:31 AM Post #9,758 of 9,764
I asked earlier for opinions on the Sylvania 6080 and got some helpful responses, but just ended up buying two variations of the tube to draw my own conclusions.

I ended up getting a triple mica, yellow lettering (early 70's?) version of the tube, basically same one as in pic from @MDR30, and what I assume by the lettering and logo to be a late 50's to early 60's 2 mica 6080 Gold Brand version - same one as in pic from @JKDJedi )

I liked both, but think the vintage 6080 Gold Brand is noticeably superior.

For around $15 USD the vanilla 6080 was far better than I expected it to be, given some feedback I had seen on the tube. It's a bargain at that price.

To my ears what you get by upgrading to the vintage Gold Brand tube is deeper / more powerful bass and better instrument separation. It just has a cleaner sound if that makes sense. This is not to say the regular 6080 is bad by any means. It's better than a number of similar tubes I've tried at a higher cost.

I am reselling the plain 6080 and one of two 6080 GB's I picked up since I ended up buying a matched pair, as there were not a lot of great options for singles (and my amp only requires one). The Sylvania 6080 Gold Brand is most definitely a keeper!

I would place the vintage Sylvania 6080 Gold Brand right up there with the Tung Sol 5998 and the Chatham 6AS7G as my favorite tubes of this type. Your mileage may vary.
Glad you liked that Gold Brand .. I had a mean hard on for the GB when I first got them, but like the other greats I've collected, they ended up on the shelf. Need to break them out again for another run.
 
May 1, 2025 at 7:42 AM Post #9,763 of 9,764
Amperex never made the 6AS7G. The only 6AS7G I have seen with Amperex branding is the Soviet 6H13C. :)
Like these. You can silkscreen it any which way, but can't hide a Russian UFO getter.


6AS7G Amperex 2.jpg
 
May 1, 2025 at 8:56 AM Post #9,764 of 9,764
Like these. You can silkscreen it any which way, but can't hide a Russian UFO getter.


Right on Bill...UFO = Russian every time :) But in the poster's pics the bottom of those tubes had double D getters. ( . ) ( . )
 

Attachments

  • 1746104391062.png
    1746104391062.png
    4.1 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top