CrystalT
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Posts
- 756
- Likes
- 34
No. Most of the compression is in frequencies the human can't even hear. Most people who tell you they can are lying, or are experiencing placebo.
Calling it now, no one will upload ABX logs of them successfully telling the difference. Many will claim it's there.
First part or second part?
Tis possible, but "night and day" is placebo.
I'll admit, maybe that was too strong a choice of words. Some of the opposing arguments are just as exaggerated, so I felt the need to compensate. All I mean to say is that the difference is not in any way what I would define as subtle. It is very clear. It seems that everyone has an extremely negative attitude and is dedicated to dispelling this as a "myth." Odd that so many cynical people are hanging out on a forum supposedly dedicated to hifi. Oh well, I'll promptly stop making a fool of myself by posting here.
Can someone PM me on which sites have quality MP3 320 kbps and procedure to use to download onto a clip using Windows.
Thank You
Could we agree, in terms of mp3 quality (320 gbps), that some youtube tracks are quite good?
Could we agree, in terms of mp3 quality (320 gbps), that some youtube tracks are quite good?
No. As far as I know, YouTube does not use MP3 in their back end, so any MP3 files obtained from YouTube will have been transcoded at least once, possibly more. Consequently, a 320 kbps file from YouTube will not contain the same information as a 320 kbps file encoded from a lossless file.
Calling it now, no one will upload ABX logs of them successfully telling the difference. Many will claim it's there.
Calling it now, no one will upload ABX logs of them successfully telling the difference. Many will claim it's there.
...so maybe its time for a reincarnation