Alexein Aner
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
- Posts
- 53
- Likes
- 14
In my opinion, Q1 mk II is some of the worst sounding DACs I've heard.. it sounds so fake. If you ever decide to buy it, don't pay more than $30.
I'll never buy from Fiio again.
Interesting - I'd agree with the sentiment if engaging bass boost (it adds too much to the mid-range, should have been targeted to sub bass only). It also had an issue with static interference with my iPhone (EMI/RFI). But as far as general sound goes - it's essentially linear with a slight touch of warmth (this is also reflected in the measurements). If it sounds fake, then so do around 70-80% of the other DACs and DAPs on the market. What headphones/earphones were you driving? Are you sure you weren't trying to power something which was beyond its capability?
I'm also curious to know his setup.
Long story short, I haven't been on headfi in years and I have no agenda and I can confidently say that the Galaxy Note 8 (FiiO CL06) to the FiiO Q1 mark II to the FiiO A5 to the Etymotics ER4XR made Tool's Fear Inoculum a tranced and lucid experience.
The instrument separation on Miles Davis' Kind of Blue was better than I expected, having owned an e17 years ago.
I've also owned ifi's micro idsd and there's a possible disadvantage in the Q1's stage parameters; and not that the Q1 and A5 pairing sounds overly congested, I could easily discern the saxophone and piano to my left from the drums behind me and the bass towards the center, etc., but I distinctively remember the micro idsd being able to provide greater dimensions or a more enveloping sound using the ER4XR's, especially with the 3d matrix.
Where the Q1 is communicative, the idsd is that while also being more demonstrative but these are only my initial impressions..
I've only had the unit since last weekend and I intend to have a more thorough experience withe the Sony xb90ex on my trip to Philly next weekend.