WindowsX
Member of the Trade: Fidelizer Audio
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Posts
- 1,962
- Likes
- 364
Lots of hand waving and distraction for the fact that you still haven't come close to supporting your claim that Fidelizer makes an audible difference outside of the limited scenario where a CPU is oversubscribed, something that is unlikely to happen on a modern PC, particularly one dedicated to audio reproduction.
If you believe :"I used to give up at some points because they believe only in measurements of audible range and that's impossible task for Fidelizer.", then we should just end the conversation because that is a completely inaccurate statement. Measuring the audible impact of Fidelizer is not particularly difficult, and the measurements have been described in this thread several times. Instead, you chose to pursue some odd form of "bit perfect" analysis, which is both irrelevant to the discussion and actually produced no results in the audible range.
I did say before and I was about to leave because you guys are asking the impossible and you said this.
Of course audible differences can be proven. Measurements and/or properly constructed ABX testing would constitute proof that your software is performing as claimed or if it is not.
Now show me an example of audible different you can measure from digital domain. I already got measurable data from pure software environment. Let's see if you can come up with something better.
Regards,
Windows X