I posted our Headfonia IE 600 review last night, here you go
https://www.headfonia.com/sennheiser-ie-600-review/
Why so? Isn't Sennheiser capable enough to make a model to compete (or complement) with their own higher-end offering at a lower price after an entire year? Isn't it what R&D is all about?The precision and detail retrieval is good and totally on par with this price segment. Of course, it’s not as refined and outspoken as the IE 900, but the IE 600 makes up for this with its natural delivery and excellent stereo imaging.
According to your previous reviews, it always seems like expensive = better, even if this kind of contradictions occur:
So, the IE900 with clearly more scooped mids than the IE600 is now more "neutrally tuned" and "reference"?"It’s not as neutrally tuned as the reference IE 900 is but it’s also much more neutral compared to the fun IE 300. However I do feel it’s closer to the neutral side than it is to the fun side, but this in a musical and slightly warmer way with a smooth delivery. (though the IE 600 is not full warm sounding IEM). The IE 600 is very natural and effortless sounding and it’s actually quite linear (see the bass part later) and balanced."
What is "reference" for you, guys? The actual IEM response or their price tag? Maybe the right words to not upset your sponsors or manufacturers who lend you their products?
Hell, even Sennheiser sells the IE600 as the versatile option with neutral tuning...
Again, excuse me? The mids are cleary so much more pronounced in the IE600, how they could be "not as pronounced as in the IE900"?Technically the mids are on the same level as the bass section. Good, but not as pronounced as in the IE 900. All-in-all it’s a great mix of technicalities and musical fun, and that makes the mid section addictive and very pleasing to the ear.
I don't think Sennheiser would punish you for a bit more honesty, on the contrary, you would gain much more credibility across the entire community.
Last edited: