Eversolo DMP-A6 Network Streamer/DAC

Jan 5, 2024 at 11:26 PM Post #527 of 1,443
I agree that A8 is a great package so i would have bought it if i hadnt already bought x26pro dac. But for many who already own external dac, dedicated streamer can be a very tempting product as well and i believe it wont be so difficult for eversolo to make that option possible. I admit 500$ is just to less than it deserves but at the price of 800 will be still a good option for many
 
Jan 5, 2024 at 11:32 PM Post #528 of 1,443
I agree that A8 is a great package so i would have bought it if i hadnt already bought x26pro dac. But for many who already own external dac, dedicated streamer can be a very tempting product as well and i believe it wont be so difficult for eversolo to make that option possible. I admit 500$ is just to less than it deserves but at the price of 800 will be still a good option for many
I own (ordered) a chord dac TT2+mscaler, after auditing the three eversolo models. and still went for the a8. The a8 digital wise sounds near the hifi rose 150 (which is over 4000 euro)

(X26pro, is nice dac by the way👍🏼, owned a while back, one of the few nice 9038pro implementations)
 
Last edited:
Jan 5, 2024 at 11:38 PM Post #529 of 1,443
I own (ordered) a chord dac TT2+mscaler, after auditing the three eversolo models. and still went for the a8. The a8 digital wise sounds near the hifi rose 150 (which is over 4000 euro)

(X26pro, is nice dac by the way👍🏼, owned a while back, one of the few nice 9038pro implementations)
Thats why i think that the streamer with reasonable price will be a super hit. Other available options are too expensive. I saw a review that dac section of A8 is as good as gustard a26. I think that a8 is a real great option for anyone who is considering buying under 2k dac. As the great streamer is coming along with a great sounding dac.
 
Jan 6, 2024 at 12:09 AM Post #530 of 1,443
Thats why i think that the streamer with reasonable price will be a super hit. Other available options are too expensive. I saw a review that dac section of A8 is as good as gustard a26. I think that a8 is a real great option for anyone who is considering buying under 2k dac. As the great streamer is coming along with a great sounding dac.
Almost a A26 yes, the A26 still wins though, but by a small margin only. The A8 is a good deal regarding that. As a dac but as a extremely well streamer too.

Don’t think they will launch a streamer only that is as good as the A8 for less than at least a A6 master edition. Why? Because you need the femto clocks AND seperate power supplies.
 
Last edited:
Jan 6, 2024 at 3:45 AM Post #531 of 1,443
If external DAC will be used, isnt it better to buy a streamer only device? Wonder if eversolo is planning to release the streamer only device. Like A8 level streaming performance with no dac under 500$. Just dreaming :)
I only use the A6 for streaming (+ some local FLAC). Of course, it would be great to have a cheaper version without the DAC section, but I am not sure how much cheaper it would be. $600 instead of $800 at best? The thing is, as a streamer the A6 sounds clearer, more detailed and better balanced than any Bluesound or iFi streamer under $1000. People who tried $1000+ streamers say the A6 can compete with even higher priced dedicated streamers. This makes it a good deal even with a built in DAC for $800. The best/clearest sounding streamer under $1K shall we say?

I have recently spent a week exclusively with the A6 as a DAC too. Normally I use my Pegasus R2R with a SR Purple fuse (I know it sounds crazy, but the fuse indeed improves the clarity of the DAC). This experience hasn't changed my view. The DAC in the A6 is decent, if I really had to, I could probably live with it. Its performance is around your average $400-$500 d/s DAC. I wouldn't even say the difference is night and day between these two DACs, but switching back to my (upgraded) Pegasus after a week did reveal some obvious changes in sound. My R2R sounds clearer than the A6 DAC, there is a lot more 3D space with more depth, better breathability and instrument separation. More natural details are coming through, as it is easier to hear them in this more natural and airier presentation. Tone is also more lifelike with more refined textures, resolution is higher. A6 DAC in comparison sounds a bit congested especially in the upper mids and treble. Also the soundscape is flatter, but actually not too bad for a d/s at this price.

So, yeah, for me the A6 was worth it as a streamer for its sound and also the ease of use (that is night and day versus the iFi Zen Stream for example). If Eversolo comes out with a Streamer only device I might be interested, but I probably couldn't sell my A6 for enough money to make the change worth let's say for a $500 A6 streamer. A $1000 A8 streamer could be interesting too, but that is kind of the very top of my budget I would ever consider spending on a streamer only device. For now my A6 does the job and does it very well.
 
Jan 6, 2024 at 3:55 AM Post #532 of 1,443
I only use the A6 for streaming (+ some local FLAC). Of course, it would be great to have a cheaper version without the DAC section, but I am not sure how much cheaper it would be. $600 instead of $800 at best? The thing is, as a streamer the A6 sounds clearer, more detailed and better balanced than any Bluesound or iFi streamer under $1000. People who tried $1000+ streamers say the A6 can compete with even higher priced dedicated streamers. This makes it a good deal even with a built in DAC for $800. The best/clearest sounding streamer under $1K shall we say?

I have recently spent a week exclusively with the A6 as a DAC too. Normally I use my Pegasus R2R with a SR Purple fuse (I know it sounds crazy, but the fuse indeed improves the clarity of the DAC). This experience hasn't changed my view. The DAC in the A6 is decent, if I really had to, I could probably live with it. Its performance is around your average $400-$500 d/s DAC. I wouldn't even say the difference is night and day between these two DACs, but switching back to my (upgraded) Pegasus after a week did reveal some obvious changes in sound. My R2R sounds clearer than the A6 DAC, there is a lot more 3D space with more depth, better breathability and instrument separation. More natural details are coming through, as it is easier to hear them in this more natural and airier presentation. Tone is also more lifelike with more refined textures, resolution is higher. A6 DAC in comparison sounds a bit congested especially in the upper mids and treble. Also the soundscape is flatter, but actually not too bad for a d/s at this price.

So, yeah, for me the A6 was worth it as a streamer for its sound and also the ease of use (that is night and day versus the iFi Zen Stream for example). If Eversolo comes out with a Streamer only device I might be interested, but I probably couldn't sell my A6 for enough money to make the change worth let's say for a $500 A6 streamer. A $1000 A8 streamer could be interesting too, but that is kind of the very top of my budget I would ever consider spending on a streamer only device. For now my A6 does the job and does it very well.
The A6 is a real bargain for it is money, absolutely!! Ad wins easily from bluesound, bluesound sucks digital and analogue. And a6 also wins digitally from the zen stream. (I own the zen stream and bluesound, so ofcourse did the compare)

I was used to already better, and that is why I did not prefeer the A6. The A8 is the best sounding digital and analogue, hearable with headphones, and extremely hearable with a full hifi set. Hifi rose 130/150 sound better (but double the a8 price). In that regard the a8 is a bargain too.

I get really annoyed when people say there is not much difference. Between the a6/master and the A8. But it depends ofcourse what the rest of your system is. On my system it was very noticable at home. Electrostatic ESL martin logan and the dac tt2+mscaler, and a very good amp from musical fidelity. Switching between them a8 and a6 digital, was from going flat to hollographic sounding.
 
Jan 6, 2024 at 7:28 PM Post #533 of 1,443
I wish we would quantify improvements. Is using the A6 with a ~ $1,000 external DAC vs. the A6 Master with the same external DAC a sizable difference? Is it worth an additional $400? I don't doubt that there is indeed a difference. What's the return on investment? Would the money be better served to upgrade other components? Same question for the A8 as I have no use for its DSP and Preamp features. Thank you.
 
Jan 6, 2024 at 7:41 PM Post #534 of 1,443
I always take the word of people who trust lines on a graph more than their own ears. Whenever I bring out my favorite test tone I love to rock out to measurements
 
Last edited:
Jan 6, 2024 at 9:34 PM Post #535 of 1,443
I only use the A6 for streaming (+ some local FLAC). Of course, it would be great to have a cheaper version without the DAC section, but I am not sure how much cheaper it would be. $600 instead of $800 at best? The thing is, as a streamer the A6 sounds clearer, more detailed and better balanced than any Bluesound or iFi streamer under $1000. People who tried $1000+ streamers say the A6 can compete with even higher priced dedicated streamers. This makes it a good deal even with a built in DAC for $800. The best/clearest sounding streamer under $1K shall we say?

I have recently spent a week exclusively with the A6 as a DAC too. Normally I use my Pegasus R2R with a SR Purple fuse (I know it sounds crazy, but the fuse indeed improves the clarity of the DAC). This experience hasn't changed my view. The DAC in the A6 is decent, if I really had to, I could probably live with it. Its performance is around your average $400-$500 d/s DAC. I wouldn't even say the difference is night and day between these two DACs, but switching back to my (upgraded) Pegasus after a week did reveal some obvious changes in sound. My R2R sounds clearer than the A6 DAC, there is a lot more 3D space with more depth, better breathability and instrument separation. More natural details are coming through, as it is easier to hear them in this more natural and airier presentation. Tone is also more lifelike with more refined textures, resolution is higher. A6 DAC in comparison sounds a bit congested especially in the upper mids and treble. Also the soundscape is flatter, but actually not too bad for a d/s at this price.

So, yeah, for me the A6 was worth it as a streamer for its sound and also the ease of use (that is night and day versus the iFi Zen Stream for example). If Eversolo comes out with a Streamer only device I might be interested, but I probably couldn't sell my A6 for enough money to make the change worth let's say for a $500 A6 streamer. A $1000 A8 streamer could be interesting too, but that is kind of the very top of my budget I would ever consider spending on a streamer only device. For now my A6 does the job and does it very well.
The A6 analogue out (using Tidal) sucks! We can safely ignore your opinion.
 
Last edited:
Jan 7, 2024 at 1:05 AM Post #536 of 1,443
I wish we would quantify improvements. Is using the A6 with a ~ $1,000 external DAC vs. the A6 Master with the same external DAC a sizable difference? Is it worth an additional $400? I don't doubt that there is indeed a difference. What's the return on investment? Would the money be better served to upgrade other components? Same question for the A8 as I have no use for its DSP and Preamp features. Thank you.
This was exactly my dilemma in beginning of last year. I did audition a6 and a6 Master at the local dealer office for 45 min using high class external dacs (since that would have been my case). The external dacs were Mojo2, iFi iDSD Pro, TT2 and some Audiolab. I did not find any difference b/n a6 and a6 Master when used like streamers, neither for headphones, nor for speakers. The used headphones were HD800s and Stax 007 mk2, the speakers Klipsch the Sevens.
There was slight difference only when a6 and a6 Master were used with the internal dac, like a6 Master giving slightly more depth and body (according to me).
 
Last edited:
Jan 7, 2024 at 3:16 AM Post #537 of 1,443
The A6 analogue out (using Tidal) sucks! We can safely ignore your opinion.
Looks like, this thread is full of gentlemen these days.

I don't use Tidal and I don't use analogue out on the A6 for music. It is always better to refrain from commenting until you fully understand what you are reacting to, otherwise you might come across as aggressive and/or ignorant.
Not for your, but for other readers interest I mostly use Qobuz or local FLAC via Supra USB cable to my R2R DAC then balanced interconnects to my amp.
 
Last edited:
Jan 7, 2024 at 4:27 AM Post #538 of 1,443
This was exactly my dilemma in beginning of last year. I did audition a6 and a6 Master at the local dealer office for 45 min using high class external dacs (since that would have been my case). The external dacs were Mojo2, iFi iDSD Pro, TT2 and some Audiolab. I did not find any difference b/n a6 and a6 Master when used like streamers, neither for headphones, nor for speakers. The used headphones were HD800s and Stax 007 mk2, the speakers Klipsch the Sevens.
There was slight difference only when a6 and a6 Master were used with the internal dac, like a6 Master giving slightly more depth and body (according to me).
Between A6 and master differences were small, the real difference started with the A8. So that’s why I think the better sound digital is a combition of things. Analogue the difference was huge, and digital more than enough for not liking the a6

So maybe the the power supply has
The most impact. But a the third party power supply almost cost 300 euro for A6. And messing with a device in warranty not my thing.
 
Jan 7, 2024 at 4:35 AM Post #539 of 1,443
This was exactly my dilemma in beginning of last year. I did audition a6 and a6 Master at the local dealer office for 45 min using high class external dacs (since that would have been my case). The external dacs were Mojo2, iFi iDSD Pro, TT2 and some Audiolab. I did not find any difference b/n a6 and a6 Master when used like streamers, neither for headphones, nor for speakers. The used headphones were HD800s and Stax 007 mk2, the speakers Klipsch the Sevens.
There was slight difference only when a6 and a6 Master were used with the internal dac, like a6 Master giving slightly more depth and body (according to me).
The streamer is exactly the same in the A6 and A6 Master. The difference is only some better-quality DAC components. If you are planning to use an external DAC, the normal A6 is enough for streaming. With the A8 it might be different, but I would only buy A8 if I was going to use its internal DAC. Which I am not interested in since I prefer R2R to d/s.
 
Jan 7, 2024 at 5:11 AM Post #540 of 1,443
The streamer is exactly the same in the A6 and A6 Master. The difference is only some better-quality DAC components. If you are planning to use an external DAC, the normal A6 is enough for streaming. With the A8 it might be different, but I would only buy A8 if I was going to use its internal DAC. Which I am not interested in since I prefer R2R to d/s.
R2r is totally different sound, just like chord dacs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top