mark88888
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2010
- Posts
- 645
- Likes
- 703
He literally says the words "worth it" in the review under his own metrics. The issue is that the ER4 has been an absolute stellar price to performance IEM so this would, by comparison, look so much worse from that perspective.
Edit: to be honest, his review sounds like he's griping about the price more than anything else. For the price, the EVO isn't a steal like how a lot of people feel the ER4, ER3, and ER2 are. But it is a fair price for the SQ you get from it.
He says that the $300 headphone performs about the same as the $500 headphone, so by his metrics it's worth it. (I suppose that he groups them by price tier, and they fall in the same tier?) But he follows it up immediately by questioning why it exists at all and calling it canned bread. This after calling the ER4 a legendary IEM that deserves all the praise it gets. I agree that the writeup isnt that favorable.