Etymotic ER3SE & ER3XR?
Nov 4, 2017 at 1:21 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 40

barihunk

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 31, 2011
Posts
47
Likes
12
Dec 7, 2017 at 1:15 PM Post #7 of 40
DSC_0155.jpg DSC_0158.jpg DSC_0163.jpg DSC_0166.jpg DSC_0167.jpg
 
Dec 8, 2017 at 12:58 PM Post #8 of 40
I upgraded to the ER3XR from the HF5. The HF5 has been my daily go to headphone to throw in my pocket and take on the go and to the office. I started looking into etymotic for passive noise isolation after listing to the "best" active noise canceling headphones out there and realizing ANC is garbage at best.

If you are familiar with the HF5, the ER3 is a step up in the detail and separation in the sound. Maybe not a huge improvement for some, but it is very noticable to me on first listening. This is especially true in the treble detail. The biggest improvement however is in the bass region. The ER3XR clearly have a much needed bass boost in the low bass/sub bass frequency response compared to the HF5. It is very clean, separated and detailed bass and not overly bass heavy. Just gives a nice bit of increased support in the low end which was the main limiting factor with the HF5.

The build quality is also significantly improved. The HF models have a plastic body and durable but thin cable. These are aluminum bodies with detachable cables which can be replaced. The cables are still quite thin but feel a bit more premium overall. This is nice as the cable seems to usually be the place where the HF models fail.

In short, the HF5 are a durable but ultimately a "disposable" ....albeit costly, consumer product by build quality standards. These are approaching more of the professional build quality with replaceable parts so they should last longer. That should be enough of a reason to buy them over slightly cheaper monitors.

If you are on a tight budget, go with the HF5 while they are on sale. If you can justify the additional $50-80 it is definitely worth it to go with the ER3.

Based on the general impression so far, I recommend strongly that most people will really enjoy the ER3xr for listening to music. The flatter response of the ER3sr may be better suited for studio monitors or musicians monitoring live performances. Though I have not tried these. Again, the slightly emphasized bass boost on the XR is far from what I'd call bass heavy. Definitely still very balanced sounding in my opinion.

One general comment/observation I've had on etymotic earphones is that they seem a little treble heavy at first and bass light in general. They really open up significantly after several hours of playback. I usually run them overnight with white, pink or brown noise playing through them to break the drivers in a bit.
 
Dec 8, 2017 at 1:50 PM Post #9 of 40
I can say that the ER3SE is different from the ER4SR, at least. I would not say worse but different. Less transparent, less extended highs, more prominent bass. Still have a flat accurate response. Like it.
 
Dec 8, 2017 at 6:02 PM Post #10 of 40
how do the highs differ on the xr and se? Is the se more natural sounding to you overall?

EDIT: Nevermind, you were comparing with the 4sr. I thought this was the 3SE vs 3XR you were describing.
 
Last edited:
Feb 12, 2018 at 3:47 PM Post #13 of 40
So they came in today and after a quick listen using my headphone comparo playlist (lots of different musical styles, some in Apple Lossless) they are very sweet for the price. I've owned every possible Ety with the exception of the new lineup of ER4 and the ER4B. And bang for the buck, the ER3XR are tough to beat at that discounted price. I have a pair of Ety Kids around here someplace, and they even sound decent enough but require amping. Not the case with the 3XR. Out of my IP8 they sound superb. Switched to Shure olive foamies, which work better than the standard Ety triple flanges or bulky foamies for me.

Anyway, the Ety sound at a (sort of) budget price, with just a bit more clean, clear bass. No EQ required with the IP8 and the Kaiser Tone app.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top