KeithEmo
Member of the Trade: Emotiva
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2014
- Posts
- 1,698
- Likes
- 868
Not at all......
However, even high quality Volume pots tend to have some channel imbalance down near the bottom of their range, while even low cost attenuators tend to be very precise.
However, even high quality Volume pots tend to have some channel imbalance down near the bottom of their range, while even low cost attenuators tend to be very precise.
Is there any reason other than price that fixed attenuators would be preferable to a passive pre-amp (ex. JDS Labs OL Switcher @ $45)? Assuming that your pre has a quality volume pot, you shouldn't be introducing channel imbalance. In my system I put the A100 downstream from my Asgard's pre-out, so I can infinitely vary the input signal to match whatever headphones I plug into the A100. This way you don't have to settle for a particular level of attenuation.