AC1
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2001
- Posts
- 795
- Likes
- 11
Ok, I am sure everybody who is interested in power cords know about these two cords by now. But very little information is found in a comparison on these.
The Nites being highly toughted here and the Elrod touted as the best cord on AA (was until the signature version of the Elrods came out). So how does the Nite stack up?
Note1: I am using my MG Head with Telefunken 12ax7 rib plate and Ei El84s with no NF. I do not have my Headmaster since it is getting Carlo modded. I also do not have on hand the Cardas/600 since the Cardas went back to be replaced by one with a new plug one. So I am using the AT A1000s.
Also if you did not know, I did not like the A1000s with the Headmaster in any way; the MG Head actually does much better with them (and is quite good), very suprising, but a subject for another topic.
Note2:This comparison is only on my Metronome transport since the EPS2 is designed for low current...some say it works on pre-amps, but I found it to constrain the dynamics with the MG Head. (both cords were used before so they should be well broken in). On the MG Head was a Monza 2.2 PC to keep that consistent which is quite good with a very open/dynamic sound with headphone amps, though not quite as refined as the other two cords.
Alright, I must say it is a rather close call to say who is better. But there are a few main differences that will really come down to preference/system.
The Nite has more high freq information, giving it more ambient detail, a bit more extension up top and better overall seperation of instruments and soundstage but through the A1000s it was fairly close.
What the Elrod has is a sound with an awsome "body" throughout the frequencys, it creates a fullness from every type of instrument that makes it very present, solid. Some cords might have a solid midrange but thin highs or some such combination which can make ceratain things sound bloated due to the discrepency. The Elrod sounds the most complete. In a way, it makes it more "musical" since the swing of the notes become more obvious because of the solid definition of the notes. When I compared it to my old Ensemble Megafluxes, the Ensembles projected instruments like it was a flat wall, the Elrod has more "3d" sound.
The Nites do not have a very full mid to low-mid range compared the Elrods (and really is where the Elrod shines), which of course can be good for certain systems, but does have a very good full bass. The Nite might go a tiny bit deeper but the solid feel of the Elrods gives it more apparent impact.
I will have to try it with more gear when it comes back, but this comparison was very revealing and I hope is an interest and helpful to someone else. As always it will be system/preference dependent to which one is better.
Question: The Nite I have is an older version with the round plug, has anyone noticed a difference with the newer Nites (triangle shaped plug)? I know some people here have both versions.
The Nites being highly toughted here and the Elrod touted as the best cord on AA (was until the signature version of the Elrods came out). So how does the Nite stack up?
Note1: I am using my MG Head with Telefunken 12ax7 rib plate and Ei El84s with no NF. I do not have my Headmaster since it is getting Carlo modded. I also do not have on hand the Cardas/600 since the Cardas went back to be replaced by one with a new plug one. So I am using the AT A1000s.
Also if you did not know, I did not like the A1000s with the Headmaster in any way; the MG Head actually does much better with them (and is quite good), very suprising, but a subject for another topic.
Note2:This comparison is only on my Metronome transport since the EPS2 is designed for low current...some say it works on pre-amps, but I found it to constrain the dynamics with the MG Head. (both cords were used before so they should be well broken in). On the MG Head was a Monza 2.2 PC to keep that consistent which is quite good with a very open/dynamic sound with headphone amps, though not quite as refined as the other two cords.
Alright, I must say it is a rather close call to say who is better. But there are a few main differences that will really come down to preference/system.
The Nite has more high freq information, giving it more ambient detail, a bit more extension up top and better overall seperation of instruments and soundstage but through the A1000s it was fairly close.
What the Elrod has is a sound with an awsome "body" throughout the frequencys, it creates a fullness from every type of instrument that makes it very present, solid. Some cords might have a solid midrange but thin highs or some such combination which can make ceratain things sound bloated due to the discrepency. The Elrod sounds the most complete. In a way, it makes it more "musical" since the swing of the notes become more obvious because of the solid definition of the notes. When I compared it to my old Ensemble Megafluxes, the Ensembles projected instruments like it was a flat wall, the Elrod has more "3d" sound.
The Nites do not have a very full mid to low-mid range compared the Elrods (and really is where the Elrod shines), which of course can be good for certain systems, but does have a very good full bass. The Nite might go a tiny bit deeper but the solid feel of the Elrods gives it more apparent impact.
I will have to try it with more gear when it comes back, but this comparison was very revealing and I hope is an interest and helpful to someone else. As always it will be system/preference dependent to which one is better.
Question: The Nite I have is an older version with the round plug, has anyone noticed a difference with the newer Nites (triangle shaped plug)? I know some people here have both versions.