Anaxilus
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Posts
- 12,065
- Likes
- 339
Quote:
what the heck are with those second set of tips.. also, why are W2s my avatar..
LOL! Gratz on the W2's.
what the heck are with those second set of tips.. also, why are W2s my avatar..
I'm pretty sure custom earmolds would balance the sound of both the SM3 and UM3x nicely and give you back that nice treble sparkle. First, they're made out of acrylic, which is a much harder and denser material than foam and therefore likely to conduct higher frequencies better. Second, those two monitors were most likely designed with the custom tips in mind (and their frequency response adjusted accordingly).
This is why I don't think the Earsonics / UM3x sound signatures are very warm by nature, but more out of universal tips choice. My "prototype" SM2 (bought very early on, with a rough finish casing) came with other sillicone tips that make their sound more balanced and not lacking at all in the treble department. So to me the Earsonics "house sound" is brighter than what the stock foam tips might lead you to believe (still warm though !). I agree that my SM2 + foam tips require a bit of EQ (to my ears) to give them sufficient clarity.
This applies to the UM3x as well. In anyway, foam tips almost always reduce treble response, and headphones which might sound lacking in the trebles department might have simply been designed with custom tips in mind : after all, aren't the UM3x universal stage monitors ?
Transparent - Easy to hear into the music, detailed, clear, not muddy. Wide flat frequency response, sharp time response, very low distortion and noise. A hear through quality that is akin to clarity and reveals all aspects of detail.
I define transparency differently than clarity. My definition of transparency is the headphones disappearing (or realizing they are there) and you are left with only the music. To me the SM3 disappears more than the e-Q7. As for clarity, the e-Q7 has better clarity on some tracks in the lower mids, but the SM3 has better bass and treble clarity. Although I do think the tonal accuracy of the midrange on the SM3 is a bit better.
And I am using Monster Cable triple flange tips for now, which you can see in the pic in post #1.
I define transparency differently than clarity. My definition of transparency is the headphones disappearing (or realizing they are there) and you are left with only the music. To me the SM3 disappears more than the e-Q7. As for clarity, the e-Q7 has better clarity on some tracks in the lower mids, but the SM3 has better bass and treble clarity. Although I do think the tonal accuracy of the midrange on the SM3 is a bit better.
And I am using Monster Cable triple flange tips for now, which you can see in the pic in post #1.
The sound from SM3 is so close to things that I actually hear in real lifeIs this called tonality? While e-Q7 sounds magical with female vocal, I agree with you that the tonal accuracy of midrange on the SM3 is better. With SM3 female vocal is very natural.
The sound from SM3 is so close to things that I actually hear in real lifeIs this called tonality?
This is called accuracy to me. People associate accuracy to flat response curves but I don't think that is necessarily true. I too often hear 'flat' speakers, headphones, IEM's that sound nothing like LIFE! Tonality doesn't have to be accurate as some may have a preferred sense of tonality which may or may not be accurate. Even then accuracy can vary from the setting of a live rock concert vs. a small live jazz setting w/o electronics for example. That's how I look at tonality and accuracy.
LOL! Gratz on the W2's.I don't even know what my avatar is but apparently I can take incoming calls.