Dynalo (Rev.C) construction thread

Nov 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM Post #166 of 188
I'm trying to calculate the value of the power LED resistor, R67 and just wanted to check my working here.
 
The LEDs I'm using are these white models (889-LW500AM) from Mouser - vF of 3.3 and 20mA current draw. Source voltage is 15.4v. I used this calculator to derive the resistor value and rating and I get 680ohm, 0.5 watts. I notice the very first post in this thread suggests 4K for R67 so I find this result strange (if logical).
 
Nov 16, 2010 at 2:02 PM Post #167 of 188
20mA is the MAXIMUM rated current. 
 
A 4Kohm resistor gets you 
I=V/R
I=(15.4V-3.3V)/4000ohms=0.003A=3mA
 
I would try the LED at low current before you go testing the maximum rated current ;) Many people find that low-power LED's at fairly low current are plenty bright for indicator lamps.
 
Nov 16, 2010 at 2:07 PM Post #168 of 188
Actually, for those leds, 100ma is the maximum current and 20ma the working current for the rated luminous intensity. see: http://www.optoga.se/pdf/LW500AM.pdf
 
Honnestly, you picked weird leds. As indicators, led rated for 3-5ma working current are bright enough. You might try them at 5ma and see if it's bright enough.
 
Dec 7, 2010 at 2:43 PM Post #170 of 188
Can some one (any one...) look over my Dynalo Schematic to see
if I made any errors? I've checked it over but another set of eyes
is always helpful.
 
Thanks!
 

 
Dec 7, 2010 at 5:02 PM Post #172 of 188
No errors, more like questions:
 
- why such a big cap (33uf) for the servo integration ?
- why diodes in serie with r19 ?
- why do you feel the need for a compensation cap with a gain of 10 ?
 
Dec 7, 2010 at 6:07 PM Post #173 of 188
1: It's hard to see in the drawing but it's .33, not 33. I guess I should write it 0.33uF.
2: It's in the Dynalo Rev. C schematic.
3: It's in the Dynalo Rev. C schematic.
 
Quote:
No errors, more like questions:
 
- why such a big cap (33uf) for the servo integration ?
- why diodes in serie with r19 ?
- why do you feel the need for a compensation cap with a gain of 10 ?



 
Dec 7, 2010 at 6:20 PM Post #175 of 188
A couple observations.
 
I've seen a touch of ringing on 100kHz square waves without some compensation.
About 5-10 pF for gain 11 increasing to 33pF at gain 2 quelled it nicely on a couple I've seen on a scope.
The dynalo mint tin boards from the group buy 5 years ago seemed to ring a bit more than the full size Rev C boards.
The rev C boards almost go overboard on film and 'lytic  rail caps everywhere, the mint tin boards had no rail caps at all.
 
I've built rev C with and without the thermal tracking diodes, I saw no harm but no benefit to including them.
 
00940 : You were involved with the mint tin board group buy from years ago ? Do you still have the board files ?
            I know the board files were posted and open source, but they are hard to find now.
       
 
Dec 7, 2010 at 6:39 PM Post #176 of 188
Has anyone built this with the j74/k170 or just
the j109/k389?
 
I was planning on using about 3 inches by 4 inches to draw my board.
I guess that would make it a full sized build. Each channel will have
it's own board.
 
Dec 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM Post #177 of 188
Quote:
bada bing said:


00940 : You were involved with the mint tin board group buy from years ago ? Do you still have the board files ?
            I know the board files were posted and open source, but they are hard to find now.
     



Sorry, I just searched my drive and couldn't find anything  :-/  I was quite a noob at that times though and was more involved with setting up a small forum for building support and parts finding. Subsonic did the work for the pcb.
 
However, if my memory is good, the PCB was heavily inspired by that layout by Sijosae:
 

 
Just stick two, one next to the other. Details here: http://www.headphoneamp.co.kr/bbs/zboard.php?id=diy_sijosae&page=2&sn1=&divpage=1&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&keyword=gilmore&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=17
 
Dec 10, 2010 at 4:18 AM Post #179 of 188
Yes PArs, your right...I did that when I connected the Servo...ooopppssss 
rolleyes.gif

I'm sure I would have caught that myself the next time I looked at it...thanks!
 
Dec 10, 2010 at 5:09 AM Post #180 of 188
Hehe it would have made for an interesting sound.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top